Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
185 bytes added ,  02:54, March 7, 2018
m
Line 39: Line 39:  
Adherents in the first three groups generally would not oppose a modern translation from the underlying texts of the KJV (though surprisingly they refuse to accept NKJV as such a translation in some instances), while those in the latter two groups are adamant that no modern translation is needed.
 
Adherents in the first three groups generally would not oppose a modern translation from the underlying texts of the KJV (though surprisingly they refuse to accept NKJV as such a translation in some instances), while those in the latter two groups are adamant that no modern translation is needed.
   −
As a consequence, some KJV Only advocates publicly go so far as to state that if any other translation besides the KJV was used in the soul winning process, then the potential convert was not genuinely saved.<ref>https://www.christianforums.com/threads/incorruptible-seed-or-no-salvation-without-kjv.4519056/</ref>
+
As a consequence, some KJV Only advocates publicly go so far as to state that if any other translation besides the KJV was used in the soul winning process, then the potential convert was not genuinely saved.<ref>https://www.christianforums.com/threads/incorruptible-seed-or-no-salvation-without-kjv.4519056/</ref>  However, others in the KJV Only movement would consider someone led to Christ using a different translation to be genuinely saved.<ref>http://samgipp.com/answerbook/?page=18.htm</ref>
    
== Criticism ==
 
== Criticism ==
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
8,856

edits

Navigation menu