Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
738 bytes added ,  07:27, March 28, 2018
The polygraph isn't the end-all be-all of truth.
Line 2: Line 2:     
:This is the "moral turpitude" [[John Brennan]] tweeted about, the year and a half long illegal surveillance having produced nothing else. The scandal remains the Clinton campaign funnelling opposition research to FBI, and the Obama FBI's illegal harassment and civil rights violations of Americans, and misuse of government offices. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 00:52, 28 March 2018 (EDT)
 
:This is the "moral turpitude" [[John Brennan]] tweeted about, the year and a half long illegal surveillance having produced nothing else. The scandal remains the Clinton campaign funnelling opposition research to FBI, and the Obama FBI's illegal harassment and civil rights violations of Americans, and misuse of government offices. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 00:52, 28 March 2018 (EDT)
 +
==About the unprotected sex==
 +
I really don't have any problem with believing Daniels' results of the lie detector test.  What I do have a problem with is that
 +
:1. A polygraph basically only work if the person undergoing the test believes it does, and
 +
:2. Pretty much everyone acting in porn (at least on the straight side) undergoes birth control plus bi-weekly STD screens as their sort of quality control within the industry.
 +
 +
Polygraphs are one of those things that liberals don't like to admit to being less foolproof than they'd like to believe.  Her questionable answer to the unprotected sex inquiry leaves the other two answers up to debate, naturally. --[[User:Pious|Pious]] ([[User talk:Pious|talk]]) 03:27, 28 March 2018 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
250

edits

Navigation menu