Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback
20,006
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 862:
Line 862: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Micro evolution: re
--[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 22:11, 30 April 2018 (EDT)
--[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 22:11, 30 April 2018 (EDT)
:The arguments are not new. Here is a short article explaining the difference: http://www.icr.org/article/what-difference-between-macroevolution-microevolut/
:Now we get to things like:
:*Why are there really no confirmed transitional species? Why do scientists keep inventing them rather than finding them?
:*Why are we not burred up to our elbows in fossils from transition species?
:*Why is it that any significant evolution in the modern day is harmful? Just look at the miracle of the four-winged fruit fly, which has no muscles attached, so they greatly impede flight. On top of this, all other fruit flies refuse to mate with them, due to the mutation.
:*Does similarity really show common ancestry, or rather common designer?
:*Why did Darwin himself declare that his entire theory should be considered null and void if the cell was ever found to be anything more than an inert building block? (of course, he knew nothing about DNA, either)
:*Why do human genes most closely match those of a worm, not an ape?
:*Why do apes have more chromosomes that humans, rather than less, as the supposed progression would suggest?
:*Why is it that since the Cambrian explosion, there have been found no new ''species'' in the fossil record?
:*Why is it that the Cambrian explosion even occurred? There is nothing gradual about that...it's just *poof* all life appears on a formerly dead planet. The only evidence of life below the Cambrian layer are a few sponge embryos, which probably got there through contamination.
:*Are humans actually devolving?
:**Humans used to live much longer than they do now. For example, Neanderthals lived so long that their jaw and foreheads (which never stop growing) grew so much as to change their appearance
:**Human teeth used to heal, but no longer do
:**Some say that human brain cavities are actually shrinking, though I have not researched this to verify the claim
:**While medical science has improved our understanding of biology, things such as allergies seem to be much ore common in recent years. Are our immune systems forgetting how to tell friend from foe?
:*How is it that a team of monkeys with a typewriter are more likely to write out the entire library of congress in chronological order by accident, than a DNA strand is to accidentally form?
:The argument is always time. They count on there being at least some shadow of a doubt about how it is just slightly possible that given a few hundred millennia, xyz might happen. Now they can't even pretend the earth is old enough to prop up this ridiculous theory, so now they are hoping to find or invent some kind of "proof" that life started on another planet, preferably so far from earth that we have no way to study it.
:And by the way, I'm not a fan of "youtubers" who use poor video editing, interruptions, and all manner of other childish methods. There is nothing intellectual or scientific about the likes of these.
:There are so many things wrong with the theory of macroevolution, that I don't even know where to start. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 01:29, 1 May 2018 (EDT)