Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
So... what do we do with this page in light of Bannon's recent comments about Donald Trump Jr.? --Unsigned comment by User:James Kardys
+
So... what do we do with this page in light of Bannon's recent comments about Donald Trump Jr.? --Unsigned comment by User:Geopolitician
    
:We should just wait and see what happens.
 
:We should just wait and see what happens.
Line 17: Line 17:  
::*(4) This entire feud is a ruse. More 4-D chess/Trump trolling. Trump and Bannon are pretending to be enemies to trick the globalists in leaving them alone, so they will have the strength to team up again and take them out for good when the time is right.
 
::*(4) This entire feud is a ruse. More 4-D chess/Trump trolling. Trump and Bannon are pretending to be enemies to trick the globalists in leaving them alone, so they will have the strength to team up again and take them out for good when the time is right.
   −
::*(5) Bannon was controlled opposition the whole time. His sole purpose was to discredit the anti-globalist movement and ensure that President Trump shifts to the left out of revulsion. -- [[User:James Kardys|James Kardys]] ([[User talk:James Kardys|talk]]) 20:10, 4 January 2018 (EST)
+
::*(5) Bannon was controlled opposition the whole time. His sole purpose was to discredit the anti-globalist movement and ensure that President Trump shifts to the left out of revulsion. -- [[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 20:10, 4 January 2018 (EST)
    
::::Bannon appears to have made these statements while he was still in the White House. I think this piece of info is key because it shows this is a relatively old statement -- a lot has passed since he made that comment, and he has made many pro-Trump statements since then. I think theory #1 is the best explanation of the ones you presented. It's understandable why someone would get so mad when having to deal with people like McMaster, Cohn, Javanka, and Tillerson. A true believer would be very angry to see these liberals hijack Trump's agenda. IMO, it's a repeat of 1964-66 and 1988 all over again. Bannon's comments seem to be old comments that are now coming back to haunt him.
 
::::Bannon appears to have made these statements while he was still in the White House. I think this piece of info is key because it shows this is a relatively old statement -- a lot has passed since he made that comment, and he has made many pro-Trump statements since then. I think theory #1 is the best explanation of the ones you presented. It's understandable why someone would get so mad when having to deal with people like McMaster, Cohn, Javanka, and Tillerson. A true believer would be very angry to see these liberals hijack Trump's agenda. IMO, it's a repeat of 1964-66 and 1988 all over again. Bannon's comments seem to be old comments that are now coming back to haunt him.
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,401

edits

Navigation menu