Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Objection to recent edit: updated statistics
Line 19: Line 19:  
:::The coup at ADF occurred early in January 2017, between Trump's election and his inauguration.  Perhaps a faction at ADF remained [[Never Trump movement|Never Trump]] and wanted to turn in that direction.
 
:::The coup at ADF occurred early in January 2017, between Trump's election and his inauguration.  Perhaps a faction at ADF remained [[Never Trump movement|Never Trump]] and wanted to turn in that direction.
   −
:::In 2015, ADF participated in 21 cases before the Supreme Court.  But after the coup, from mid-2017 through the present, ADF has participated in only 6 Supreme Court cases -- less than one-third its prior annual output.  After the coup, ADF was notably absence in Trump's opposition to a right to abortion by illegal aliens (''Azar v. Garza''), and in [[David Daleiden]]'s important case.
+
:::In 2015, ADF participated in about 22 cases before the Supreme Court.  But after the coup, from mid-2017 through the present, ADF has participated in only about 9 Supreme Court cases -- less than one-third its prior annual output.  After the coup, ADF was notably absence in Trump's opposition to a right to abortion by illegal aliens (''Azar v. Garza''), and in David Daleiden's important case.
    
:::None of your above-cited cases are leading-edge cases on the [[abortion]] issue.  ''NIFLA'' is really a [[free speech]] case, whose decision will probably be issued tomorrow (Monday at 10am).  The ''Masterpiece Cakeshop'' case was initiated by ADF before the Supreme Court prior to ADF's coup.  The NC case is a factually simple [[Establishment Clause]] case.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:38, 25 June 2018 (EDT)
 
:::None of your above-cited cases are leading-edge cases on the [[abortion]] issue.  ''NIFLA'' is really a [[free speech]] case, whose decision will probably be issued tomorrow (Monday at 10am).  The ''Masterpiece Cakeshop'' case was initiated by ADF before the Supreme Court prior to ADF's coup.  The NC case is a factually simple [[Establishment Clause]] case.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:38, 25 June 2018 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,400

edits

Navigation menu