Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Objection to recent edit: P.S. further reply
Line 22: Line 22:     
:::None of your above-cited cases are leading-edge cases on the [[abortion]] issue.  ''NIFLA'' is really a [[free speech]] case, whose decision will probably be issued tomorrow (Monday at 10am).  The ''Masterpiece Cakeshop'' case was initiated by ADF before the Supreme Court prior to ADF's coup.  The NC case is a factually simple [[Establishment Clause]] case.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:38, 25 June 2018 (EDT)
 
:::None of your above-cited cases are leading-edge cases on the [[abortion]] issue.  ''NIFLA'' is really a [[free speech]] case, whose decision will probably be issued tomorrow (Monday at 10am).  The ''Masterpiece Cakeshop'' case was initiated by ADF before the Supreme Court prior to ADF's coup.  The NC case is a factually simple [[Establishment Clause]] case.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:38, 25 June 2018 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::P.S.  Surprised by your statement about ADF supposedly praising Trump's first 100 days, I clicked on your link.  ADF merely praised only 4 actions taken by Trump during his entire first 100 days, without really praising Trump himself.  Two of those four actions were the appointments of people favored by ADF; the other two were straightforward reinstatements of prior policies of Republican Administrations.  Notably absent is any praise by ADF of Trump on his flagship issues like immigration policy.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:49, 25 June 2018 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,400

edits

Navigation menu