Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 94:
Line 94: + +
Talk:Alliance Defending Freedom (view source)
Revision as of 12:14, June 28, 2018
, 12:14, June 28, 2018no edit summary
::::::::::I reread the intro, and don't see anything implying that the ADF is like the ACLU, or that the ADF is not somewhat conservative. The Koch brothers' network are substantial supporters of ADF, I think, and it is difficult any other way to explain the coup that installed Farris in charge of ADF. Farris has been pushing Koch brothers' [[Convention of States]] for years.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:49, 28 June 2018 (EDT)
::::::::::I reread the intro, and don't see anything implying that the ADF is like the ACLU, or that the ADF is not somewhat conservative. The Koch brothers' network are substantial supporters of ADF, I think, and it is difficult any other way to explain the coup that installed Farris in charge of ADF. Farris has been pushing Koch brothers' [[Convention of States]] for years.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:49, 28 June 2018 (EDT)
:::::::::::We should at least link to the [[conservative]] article in the first sentence even if we "qualify" the label, and we should give a better explanation on why their current leadership is problematic. Them not giving an opinion on the travel ban case is a weak evidence to use, ''at least'' when we use it ''as the main evidence'' -- surely, we can go into specifics on who's in charge and why they're problematic ''before'' we complain about a religious freedom organization not giving an opinion on a national security case (otherwise, readers will have no idea on why it's bad, and we should make it clear to them). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:14, 28 June 2018 (EDT)