:::::::::::We should at least link to the [[conservative]] article in the first sentence even if we "qualify" the label, and we should give a better explanation on why their current leadership is problematic. Them not giving an opinion on the travel ban case is a weak evidence to use, ''at least'' when we use it ''as the main evidence'' -- surely, we can go into specifics on who's in charge and why they're problematic ''before'' we complain about a religious freedom organization not giving an opinion on a national security case (otherwise, readers will have no idea on why it's bad, and we should make it clear to them). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:14, 28 June 2018 (EDT) | :::::::::::We should at least link to the [[conservative]] article in the first sentence even if we "qualify" the label, and we should give a better explanation on why their current leadership is problematic. Them not giving an opinion on the travel ban case is a weak evidence to use, ''at least'' when we use it ''as the main evidence'' -- surely, we can go into specifics on who's in charge and why they're problematic ''before'' we complain about a religious freedom organization not giving an opinion on a national security case (otherwise, readers will have no idea on why it's bad, and we should make it clear to them). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:14, 28 June 2018 (EDT) |