Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 408: Line 408:     
::::: I am not going to pay the $27 to try to find out. What if someone else says the Moon is made of green cheese and cites a web site? It is not much evidence that there is any significant belief in a green cheese theory. Maybe it could be mentioned in an article on Internet scams or something like that. I did look at the work that Mmeelliissssaa referred me too, and it is not a serious piece of work. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 12:49, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::::: I am not going to pay the $27 to try to find out. What if someone else says the Moon is made of green cheese and cites a web site? It is not much evidence that there is any significant belief in a green cheese theory. Maybe it could be mentioned in an article on Internet scams or something like that. I did look at the work that Mmeelliissssaa referred me too, and it is not a serious piece of work. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 12:49, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::Exactly what i try to tell to creationists time to time, if 99% of biologists think creationism has no merits and is just view held by few people because of their religios beliefs, why waste time and space on encyclopedia for that. But still, most encyclopedias like wikipedia are willing to add articles that admit that some people still beliave earth to be 6000 years old. But i see Conservapedia is taking a stricter attitude here. Im all in favour of it. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 12:57, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
188

edits

Navigation menu