287
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 410:
Line 410: + +
→[[Geocentric theory]]: Sysop adding this kind of jokes
::::::Exactly what i try to tell to creationists time to time, if 99% of biologists think creationism has no merits and is just view held by few people because of their religios beliefs, why waste time and space on encyclopedia for that. But still, most encyclopedias like wikipedia are willing to add articles that admit that some people still beliave earth to be 6000 years old. But i see Conservapedia is taking a stricter attitude here. Im all in favour of it. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 12:57, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
::::::Exactly what i try to tell to creationists time to time, if 99% of biologists think creationism has no merits and is just view held by few people because of their religios beliefs, why waste time and space on encyclopedia for that. But still, most encyclopedias like wikipedia are willing to add articles that admit that some people still beliave earth to be 6000 years old. But i see Conservapedia is taking a stricter attitude here. Im all in favour of it. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 12:57, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
::::: What is the idea in adding joke pages (for example fixedearth) as referencies - I don't understand it if this site is trying to be encyclopedic one and not a joke collection!? They are _parodies_ written about Christians. Irony and taunt. And even better joke if someone takes it as earnestly written. --[[User:Aulis Eskola|Aulis Eskola]] 13:42, 4 May 2007 (EDT)