Changes

'''Christine Blasey Ford''' is a [[George Soros]] mercenary who made confusing and conflicting allegations about [[SCOTUS]] nominee [[Brett Kavanaugh]] to deflect allegations by the [[MeToo movement]] against major [[Left-wing war on women|Hollywood and media]] donors to the [[Democrat Party]] prior to the [[2018 Midterm election]].<ref>https://washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/18/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-and-links-ge/</ref> Blasey Ford refused to back up her claims under [[oath]] when invited by the [[Republican]] controlled Senate Judiciary Committee to do so.<ref>https://time.com/5398806/senate-public-hearing-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford/</ref> She later relented and agreed to give sworn testimony, implying senior Republican leaders were not "fair" in asking her to testify.<ref>https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/20/kavanaugh-accuser-testimony-senate/</ref>

'''Christine Blasey Ford''' is a [[George Soros]] mercenary who made confusing and conflicting allegations about [[SCOTUS]] nominee [[Brett Kavanaugh]] to deflect allegations by the [[MeToo movement]] against major [[Left-wing war on women|Hollywood and media]] donors to the [[Democrat Party]] prior to the [[2018 Midterm election]].<ref>https://washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/18/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-and-links-ge/</ref> Blasey Ford refused to back up her claims under [[oath]] when invited by the [[Republican]] controlled Senate Judiciary Committee to do so.<ref>https://time.com/5398806/senate-public-hearing-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford/</ref> She later relented and agreed to give sworn testimony, implying senior Republican leaders were not "fair" in asking her to testify.<ref>https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/20/kavanaugh-accuser-testimony-senate/</ref>

''[[The Washington Post]]'', noted for [[fake news]] and an [[anti-Trump]] bias,<ref>https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/washington-post-fake-news-passports-media-bias/</ref> first published Blasey Ford's allegations under an anonymous op-ed byline. Sen. [[Dianne Feinstein]], who recently had been exposed as [[colluding]] with [[Chinese]] intelligence for twenty years,<ref>https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2018/08/23/aces-dianne-feinstein-threatens-that-history-will-not-look-kindly-on-kavanaugh-trips-over-her-chinese-spy/</ref> did not ask the FBI to investigate when she recieved the lettrr but rather passed the anonymous slanders along to ''WaPo''.<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/news/dianne-feinstein-falsely-claims-gop-blocking-fbi-probe-of-kavanaugh-allegation/</ref><ref>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/msn/how-feinstein-is-conspiring-to-destroy-kavanaugh/ar-AAAuxh9</ref> Feinstein indicated she herself did not believe the allegations.<ref>https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/18/democrats-hearing-ford-kavanaugh-feinstein-truthful/</ref>  

''[[The Washington Post]]'', noted for [[fake news]] and an [[anti-Trump]] bias,<ref>https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/washington-post-fake-news-passports-media-bias/</ref> first published Blasey Ford's allegations under an anonymous op-ed byline. Sen. [[Dianne Feinstein]], who recently had been exposed as [[colluding]] with [[Chinese]] intelligence for twenty years,<ref>https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2018/08/23/aces-dianne-feinstein-threatens-that-history-will-not-look-kindly-on-kavanaugh-trips-over-her-chinese-spy/</ref> did not ask the FBI to investigate when she recieved the letter but rather passed the anonymous slanders along to ''WaPo''.<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/news/dianne-feinstein-falsely-claims-gop-blocking-fbi-probe-of-kavanaugh-allegation/</ref><ref>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/msn/how-feinstein-is-conspiring-to-destroy-kavanaugh/ar-AAAuxh9</ref> Feinstein indicated she herself did not believe the allegations.<ref>https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/18/democrats-hearing-ford-kavanaugh-feinstein-truthful/</ref>  

Blasey Ford was directed by unknown operatives to take a polygraph examination in August 2018 while her allegations were withheld from the [[FBI]] during the FBI's pre-hearing vetting process.

Blasey Ford was directed by unknown operatives to take a polygraph examination in August 2018 while her allegations were withheld from the [[FBI]] during the FBI's pre-hearing vetting process.

Blasey Ford was granted an extraordinary amount of [[white privilege]] by [[racist]] [[liberal]] Democrats and [[mainstream media]] while the accuser of Democrat party Vice Chairman [[Keith Ellison]] - alleged to have engaged in woman-beating in 2017, was marginalized and ignored.<ref>[https://youtu.be/BpxSgiKTBpE Christine Blasey Ford white privilege vs. Karen Monahan and the DNC]</ref> Ellison's accuser produced medical records from two incidents and informed multiple people at the time of the violent attacks.<ref>" I've been smeared, threatened, isolated from my own party. I provided medical records from 2017, stating on two different Dr. Visits, I told them about the abuse and who did it. My therapist released records stating I have been dealing and healing from the abuse." https://twitter.com/KarenMonahan01/status/1041675264441253888</ref> Both Ellison and the accuser are minorities.

Blasey Ford was granted an extraordinary amount of [[white privilege]] by [[racist]] [[liberal]] Democrats and [[mainstream media]] while the accuser of Democrat party Vice Chairman [[Keith Ellison]] - alleged to have engaged in woman-beating in 2017 - was marginalized and ignored.<ref>[https://youtu.be/BpxSgiKTBpE Christine Blasey Ford white privilege vs. Karen Monahan and the DNC]</ref> Ellison's accuser produced medical records from two incidents and informed multiple people at the time of the violent attacks.<ref>" I've been smeared, threatened, isolated from my own party. I provided medical records from 2017, stating on two different Dr. Visits, I told them about the abuse and who did it. My therapist released records stating I have been dealing and healing from the abuse." https://twitter.com/KarenMonahan01/status/1041675264441253888</ref> Both Ellison and the accuser are minorities.

The case is reminiscent of the 1991 Democrat-concocted [[Anita Hill]] smears against an [[African-American]] nominee to the Supreme Court by a Republican president.<ref>The [[U.S. Senate]] ultimately determined Hill was lying. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/us/politics/20thomas.html</ref> Democrats were fearful of a [[conservative]] Black becoming a role model for youth, and attacked him with the most vicious, vile, and racist smears.

The case is reminiscent of the 1991 Democrat-concocted [[Anita Hill]] smears against an [[African-American]] nominee to the Supreme Court by a Republican president.<ref>The [[U.S. Senate]] ultimately determined Hill was lying. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/us/politics/20thomas.html</ref> Democrats were fearful of a [[conservative]] Black becoming a role model for youth, and attacked him with the most vicious, vile, and racist smears.