The argument is fallacious because ''A'' and ''B'' could be different in a way that is relevant to whether ''A'' has property ''P''. In other words, everything is "like" everything else in some way, but not all things share the same properties. A common humorous example is "God is love; love is blind; Stevie Wonder is blind; therefore, Stevie Wonder is God." | The argument is fallacious because ''A'' and ''B'' could be different in a way that is relevant to whether ''A'' has property ''P''. In other words, everything is "like" everything else in some way, but not all things share the same properties. A common humorous example is "God is love; love is blind; Stevie Wonder is blind; therefore, Stevie Wonder is God." |