SkipCaptcha
35,519
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: − + + + − <references/>+ +
no edit summary
The argument is fallacious because ''A'' and ''B'' could be different in a way that is relevant to whether ''A'' has property ''P''. In other words, everything is "like" everything else in some way, but not all things share the same properties. A common humorous example is "God is love; love is blind; Stevie Wonder is blind; therefore, Stevie Wonder is God."
The argument is fallacious because ''A'' and ''B'' could be different in a way that is relevant to whether ''A'' has property ''P''. In other words, everything is "like" everything else in some way, but not all things share the same properties. A common humorous example is "God is love; love is blind; Stevie Wonder is blind; therefore, Stevie Wonder is God."
See also [[Fallacy of analogy]].
==See also==
*[[Fallacy of analogy]]
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]