Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, Bots, edit
57,719
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 22:
Line 22: − +
→Illinois: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://dailycaller.com → https://dailycaller.com
In October 2010, reactions to the corruption of the previous governor resulted in a proposed recall law:
In October 2010, reactions to the corruption of the previous governor resulted in a proposed recall law:
* The proposed law would require that at least 20 state representatives and 10 state senators divided equally between both political parties sign a notice of intent to recall the governor before a petition could be circulated. Then, 60 percent of the electorate would have to approve the recall.<ref name=dailycaller>Knight R, "[http://dailycaller.com/2010/10/25/aclu-calls-illinois-recall-proposal-what-else-unconstitutional/ ACLU Calls Illinois Recall Proposal—What Else?—Unconstitutional]," ''The Daily Caller'', 25 October 2010. Retrieved 18 November 2010.</ref>
* The proposed law would require that at least 20 state representatives and 10 state senators divided equally between both political parties sign a notice of intent to recall the governor before a petition could be circulated. Then, 60 percent of the electorate would have to approve the recall.<ref name=dailycaller>Knight R, "[https://dailycaller.com/2010/10/25/aclu-calls-illinois-recall-proposal-what-else-unconstitutional/ ACLU Calls Illinois Recall Proposal—What Else?—Unconstitutional]," ''The Daily Caller'', 25 October 2010. Retrieved 18 November 2010.</ref>
===New Jersey===
===New Jersey===