Changes

:<small> <blockquote> Hooykaas defends the connection between Protestantism and the rise of science while distinguishing his postion from Weber and Merton regarding economic activity. This short essay has been superseded by [his book ''Robert Boyle'' (1997)].<ref name=brooks>''Science and Religion in the English Speaking World, 1600-1727 A Biliographic Guide to the Secondary Literature'', Richard S. Brooks & David K. Himrod, [[Scarecrow Press]], 2001, ISBN 0-8108-4011-1, pp. 201-203</ref>  </blockquote>  </small>

:<small> <blockquote> Hooykaas defends the connection between Protestantism and the rise of science while distinguishing his postion from Weber and Merton regarding economic activity. This short essay has been superseded by [his book ''Robert Boyle'' (1997)].<ref name=brooks>''Science and Religion in the English Speaking World, 1600-1727 A Biliographic Guide to the Secondary Literature'', Richard S. Brooks & David K. Himrod, [[Scarecrow Press]], 2001, ISBN 0-8108-4011-1, pp. 201-203</ref>  </blockquote>  </small>

*"Science and Theology in the Middle Ages" ''Free University Quarterly'' 3, 1954, pp.&nbsp;77–163.

*"Science and Theology in the Middle Ages" ''Free University Quarterly'' 3, 1954, pp.&nbsp;77–163.

* [http://books.google.com/books?id=3TgYAAAAIAAJ&pgis=1 ''Natural Law and Divine Miracle: The Principle of Uniformity in Geology, Biology, and Theology''], Leiden: [[EJ Brill]], 1963

* [https://books.google.com/books?id=3TgYAAAAIAAJ&pgis=1 ''Natural Law and Divine Miracle: The Principle of Uniformity in Geology, Biology, and Theology''], Leiden: [[EJ Brill]], 1963

::<small> <blockquote> Though primarily focusing on discussions in the nineteenth century, the chapter on theology (outlining four different metaphysical positions) is also relevant to earlier debates.<ref name=brooks/>  </blockquote> </small>  

::<small> <blockquote> Though primarily focusing on discussions in the nineteenth century, the chapter on theology (outlining four different metaphysical positions) is also relevant to earlier debates.<ref name=brooks/>  </blockquote> </small>  

* "Teilhardism, a pseudoscientific delusion" ''Free University Quarterly'' 9, 1963, pp.&nbsp;1–57

* "Teilhardism, a pseudoscientific delusion" ''Free University Quarterly'' 9, 1963, pp.&nbsp;1–57

* "Teilhardism, its predecessors, adherents and critics" ''Free University Quarterly'' 9, 1963, pp.&nbsp;58–83

* "Teilhardism, its predecessors, adherents and critics" ''Free University Quarterly'' 9, 1963, pp.&nbsp;58–83

* [http://books.google.com/books?id=c6TEDHvAbXAC ''Religion and the Rise of Modern Science''], Regent College Publishing, 2000 (Other edition  Edinburgh: [[Scottish Academic Press]], 1973 [1st Pub. 1972]). ISBN 1-5738-3018-6

* [https://books.google.com/books?id=c6TEDHvAbXAC ''Religion and the Rise of Modern Science''], Regent College Publishing, 2000 (Other edition  Edinburgh: [[Scottish Academic Press]], 1973 [1st Pub. 1972]). ISBN 1-5738-3018-6

:<small> <blockquote> This book is a systematic and articulate attempt to show the philosophical as well as sociological connections between science and Protestantism in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Hooykaas tends to oversimplify when he categorizes "types" of Christianity and of philosophy. His own theological biases sometimes intrude. But the book remains important for anyone doing work in our field. It is excellent for an introductory discussion of the philosophical issues--and especially as regards the relation of the "voluntaristic doctrine of God" to early modern natural philosophy. Hooykaas examines continental as well as English Calvinists and considers why and how they believed science should be cultivated: (1) to the glory of God and to the benefit of humankind; (2) empirically, in spite of human authorities; and (3) by using our hands. The book is a veritable mine of relevant biblical texts.<ref name=brooks/>  </blockquote> </small>  

:<small> <blockquote> This book is a systematic and articulate attempt to show the philosophical as well as sociological connections between science and Protestantism in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Hooykaas tends to oversimplify when he categorizes "types" of Christianity and of philosophy. His own theological biases sometimes intrude. But the book remains important for anyone doing work in our field. It is excellent for an introductory discussion of the philosophical issues--and especially as regards the relation of the "voluntaristic doctrine of God" to early modern natural philosophy. Hooykaas examines continental as well as English Calvinists and considers why and how they believed science should be cultivated: (1) to the glory of God and to the benefit of humankind; (2) empirically, in spite of human authorities; and (3) by using our hands. The book is a veritable mine of relevant biblical texts.<ref name=brooks/>  </blockquote> </small>  

* ''Humanism and the Voyages of Discovery in 16th Century Portuguese Science and Letters'', North-Holland Publishing Company, 1979, 67 pages  

* ''Humanism and the Voyages of Discovery in 16th Century Portuguese Science and Letters'', North-Holland Publishing Company, 1979, 67 pages  

* '''''Robert Boyle:''' a study in science and Christian belief'', [[University Press of America]], 1997 ISBN 0-7618-0708-X

* '''''Robert Boyle:''' a study in science and Christian belief'', [[University Press of America]], 1997 ISBN 0-7618-0708-X

:<small> <blockquote> This work is important but [originally] in Dutch. It has been used as evidence by some scholars advancing the Protestantism-and-the-rise-of-science thesis. Hooykaas describes well Boyle's voluntartistic dotrine of God, his religious motivation and his justification for doing natural philosophy.<ref name=brooks/>  </blockquote> </small>  

:<small> <blockquote> This work is important but [originally] in Dutch. It has been used as evidence by some scholars advancing the Protestantism-and-the-rise-of-science thesis. Hooykaas describes well Boyle's voluntartistic dotrine of God, his religious motivation and his justification for doing natural philosophy.<ref name=brooks/>  </blockquote> </small>  

* [http://books.google.com/books?id=DtMEAAAACAAJ ''Fact, Faith, and Fiction in the Development of Science''], Volume 205 in the [[Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science]], [[Kluwer Academic Publishers]], 1999, ISBN 0-7923-5774-4

* [https://books.google.com/books?id=DtMEAAAACAAJ ''Fact, Faith, and Fiction in the Development of Science''], Volume 205 in the [[Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science]], [[Kluwer Academic Publishers]], 1999, ISBN 0-7923-5774-4

==Works compared==

==Works compared==

The historian and theologian [[John Hedley Brooke]] has said that British chemist and historian [[Colin A. Russell]]'s [http://books.google.com/books?id=t_kbAAAAMAAJ&pgis=1 ''Cross-currents: interactions between science and faith''] ([[Leicester]], 1985) shares some of Hooykaas's views.<ref>[[John Hedley Brooke]], ''Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives'', 1991, [[Cambridge University Press]], ISBN 0-521-23961-3, page 350</ref>

The historian and theologian [[John Hedley Brooke]] has said that British chemist and historian [[Colin A. Russell]]'s [https://books.google.com/books?id=t_kbAAAAMAAJ&pgis=1 ''Cross-currents: interactions between science and faith''] ([[Leicester]], 1985) shares some of Hooykaas's views.<ref>[[John Hedley Brooke]], ''Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives'', 1991, [[Cambridge University Press]], ISBN 0-521-23961-3, page 350</ref>

==See also==

==See also==