| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| | *"Pascal: His Science and His Religion" ''Tractrix'' 1, 1989, pp. 115–139. (Translation of "Pascal: Zijn wetenschap en zijn religie", 1939 ) | | *"Pascal: His Science and His Religion" ''Tractrix'' 1, 1989, pp. 115–139. (Translation of "Pascal: Zijn wetenschap en zijn religie", 1939 ) |
| | *"Science and Reformation", [[Journal of World History]], 3(1956): pp. 109–139. | | *"Science and Reformation", [[Journal of World History]], 3(1956): pp. 109–139. |
| − | :<small> <blockquote> In this once-important article defending the Protestantism thesis, Hooykaas shows "how the religious attitude of so-called 'ascetic' Protestantism, which more or less stood under Calvin's influence, furthered the development of science." This article is an acknowledged summary of (and thus has been superseded by) [''Religion and the Rise of Modern Science'' (1972)]<ref name=brooks/> </blockquote> </small> | + | :<small> <blockquote> In this once-important article defending the Protestantism thesis, Hooykaas shows "how the religious attitude of so-called '[[Ascesis|ascetic]]' Protestantism, which more or less stood under Calvin's influence, furthered the development of science." This article is an acknowledged summary of (and thus has been superseded by) [''Religion and the Rise of Modern Science'' (1972)]<ref name=brooks/> </blockquote> </small> |
| | *"Answer to Dr. Bainton's Comment on 'Science and Reformation'", [[Journal of World History]], 3 (1957), pages 781-784. | | *"Answer to Dr. Bainton's Comment on 'Science and Reformation'", [[Journal of World History]], 3 (1957), pages 781-784. |
| | :<small> <blockquote> Hooykaas defends the connection between Protestantism and the rise of science while distinguishing his postion from Weber and Merton regarding economic activity. This short essay has been superseded by [his book ''Robert Boyle'' (1997)].<ref name=brooks>''Science and Religion in the English Speaking World, 1600-1727 A Biliographic Guide to the Secondary Literature'', Richard S. Brooks & David K. Himrod, [[Scarecrow Press]], 2001, ISBN 0-8108-4011-1, pp. 201-203</ref> </blockquote> </small> | | :<small> <blockquote> Hooykaas defends the connection between Protestantism and the rise of science while distinguishing his postion from Weber and Merton regarding economic activity. This short essay has been superseded by [his book ''Robert Boyle'' (1997)].<ref name=brooks>''Science and Religion in the English Speaking World, 1600-1727 A Biliographic Guide to the Secondary Literature'', Richard S. Brooks & David K. Himrod, [[Scarecrow Press]], 2001, ISBN 0-8108-4011-1, pp. 201-203</ref> </blockquote> </small> |