nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 263:
Line 263: + + +
→Conflict of Interest?: Any specific concerns?
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:53, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:53, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
::I take your point, and if Conservative's purpose was to make both articles accurate then I would agree with you. But clearly he is pushing some form of YEC agenda, presenting YEC as at least on par with if not superior to evolution, and avoiding criticism thereof, and inserting long debunked creationist "critical analysis" into the evolution article while removing supporting evidence. This smacks to me of conflict of interest. [[User:Stile4aly|Stile4aly]] 07:07, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
::I take your point, and if Conservative's purpose was to make both articles accurate then I would agree with you. But clearly he is pushing some form of YEC agenda, presenting YEC as at least on par with if not superior to evolution, and avoiding criticism thereof, and inserting long debunked creationist "critical analysis" into the evolution article while removing supporting evidence. This smacks to me of conflict of interest. [[User:Stile4aly|Stile4aly]] 07:07, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:::But YEC ''is'' superior to evolution! And I disagree that the creationist stuff has been debunked (although I'm not saying that ''absolutely none'' of the stuff Conservative has put is has been debunked; I haven't checked every single bit).
:::However, I'm not make a general defence of the way that any particular editor (other than me!) has presented something. There's always room for improvement, and if you have any ''specific'' concerns that you don't feel comfortable changing yourself (or can't because an article is protected), please mention them and I'll either incorporate them or explain why I don't agree. (The [[Theory of Evolution]] article is an exception, though, because my reading of the Panel's decision is that no changes should be made to the main body of the article without their approval.)
:::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:56, 6 May 2007 (EDT)