368
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 266:
Line 266: + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
:::However, I'm not make a general defence of the way that any particular editor (other than me!) has presented something. There's always room for improvement, and if you have any ''specific'' concerns that you don't feel comfortable changing yourself (or can't because an article is protected), please mention them and I'll either incorporate them or explain why I don't agree. (The [[Theory of Evolution]] article is an exception, though, because my reading of the Panel's decision is that no changes should be made to the main body of the article without their approval.)
:::However, I'm not make a general defence of the way that any particular editor (other than me!) has presented something. There's always room for improvement, and if you have any ''specific'' concerns that you don't feel comfortable changing yourself (or can't because an article is protected), please mention them and I'll either incorporate them or explain why I don't agree. (The [[Theory of Evolution]] article is an exception, though, because my reading of the Panel's decision is that no changes should be made to the main body of the article without their approval.)
:::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:56, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:56, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
==Eternal Universe?==
I already brought this up at the [[Universe]] article, but I'm gonna ask it again.
What is a statement about an eternal universe doing here, no one believes in an eternal universe, certainly no evolutionists or astronomers.
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]]