nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 109:
Line 109: + + +
→Young earth?: On the Big Bang
:: Whether you believe in it is irrelevant. Numerical predictions from the Big Bang agree with the Hubble relationship between velocity and distance for galaxies, with the pattern of temperature anistropities of the cosmic microwave backround, and the primordial element abdundances. Show me another theory that gives the same level of numerical prediction as compared to reality. Whatever theory you profess instead better be able to account for at least these observations in order for it to be valid description of reality. --[[User:Mackronking2|Mackronking2]] 10:27, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:: Whether you believe in it is irrelevant. Numerical predictions from the Big Bang agree with the Hubble relationship between velocity and distance for galaxies, with the pattern of temperature anistropities of the cosmic microwave backround, and the primordial element abdundances. Show me another theory that gives the same level of numerical prediction as compared to reality. Whatever theory you profess instead better be able to account for at least these observations in order for it to be valid description of reality. --[[User:Mackronking2|Mackronking2]] 10:27, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:::Whether or not I believe the Big Bang is TOTALLY relevant—to Aknot's question of whether or not I believe in the Big Bang!
:::The Big Bang theory is not the unassailable theory that you make it out to be. See [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2019 here] for some reasons, and if you want further reading, see [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3051/#big_bang here].
:::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:52, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
== Young earth creationist view ==
== Young earth creationist view ==