27
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 112:
Line 112: +
no edit summary
:::The Big Bang theory is not the unassailable theory that you make it out to be. See [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2019 here] for some reasons, and if you want further reading, see [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3051/#big_bang here].
:::The Big Bang theory is not the unassailable theory that you make it out to be. See [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2019 here] for some reasons, and if you want further reading, see [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3051/#big_bang here].
:::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:52, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:52, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
::::Philip, I never said the Big Bang theory was unassailable. I'm willing to believe in any theory that does the better job in explaining reality. To me, that means giving numerical predicitions for such things as the temperature anisotropities of the cosmic microwave background and the primoridal Li/H elemntal abundances. If you think there is a better theory, then just quote the Li/H ratio predicted by that theory and compare it to observations of the Li/H ratios in stellar atmospheres. There's no point in arguing with words; just let the numerical predictions confirm which theory is the best description of reality.--[[User:Mackronking2|Mackronking2]] 11:06, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
== Young earth creationist view ==
== Young earth creationist view ==