Changes

For example, the articles on [[autoeroticism]] and [[oral sex]] have been deleted and prevented from being created. Now, I can understand that conservatives find oral sex immoral, indecent, disgusting, sinful or whatever, but why not simply explain that in the article about oral sex, and perhaps support it with other facts, such as the spread of STDs through oral sex? Why pretend that oral sex and autoeroticism, something practised by billions of people, does not exist?  

For example, the articles on [[autoeroticism]] and [[oral sex]] have been deleted and prevented from being created. Now, I can understand that conservatives find oral sex immoral, indecent, disgusting, sinful or whatever, but why not simply explain that in the article about oral sex, and perhaps support it with other facts, such as the spread of STDs through oral sex? Why pretend that oral sex and autoeroticism, something practised by billions of people, does not exist?  

Some may argue that oral sex is simply not important enough to be included here. But this is not the case. In America it is a topic of heated debate, and many Americans have been politically persecuted for practising it, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilson_v._State_of_Georgia some] as recently as 3 years ago.     

Some may argue that oral sex is simply not important enough to be included here. But this is not the case. In America it is a topic of heated debate, and many Americans have been politically persecuted for practising it, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilson_v._State_of_Georgia some] as recently as 3 years ago.     

And if you want to "protect" children who read this site, you don't NEED to describe the graphic details of oral sex, all you need to do is talk about the controversies surrounding it.

And if you want to "protect" children who read this site, you don't NEED to describe the graphic details of oral sex, all you need to do is talk about the controversies surrounding it.

:::You are making a blanket, false and rather trite statement that "conservatives" disapprove of things because they don't have articles about them or discuss them at the water cooler. That demonstrates very poor reasoning on your part. A healthy, active and satisfying sex life within marriage is a ''good thing'' and nothing to be ashamed of. But similarly, my wife and I don't rut in the supermarket because it is also a private thing for us within our marriage. As for the article on homosexuality, if I was the site owner I would delete that too. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 09:09, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

:::You are making a blanket, false and rather trite statement that "conservatives" disapprove of things because they don't have articles about them or discuss them at the water cooler. That demonstrates very poor reasoning on your part. A healthy, active and satisfying sex life within marriage is a ''good thing'' and nothing to be ashamed of. But similarly, my wife and I don't rut in the supermarket because it is also a private thing for us within our marriage. As for the article on homosexuality, if I was the site owner I would delete that too. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 09:09, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

:::: Most conservatives ''do'' disapprove of autoeroticism and fellatio. In many conservative-dominated states in America the practice was punishable by prison until recently! You argue that conservatives see sexual practices as a purely private matter and that this is the reason they don't talk about them. But they don't. Conservatives have a long history of trying to meddle with the private sexual life of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowers_v._Hardwick others] (even non-conservatives). Fact is, currently there ''is'' a political debate going on between conservatives about the legality of fellatio, and this encyclopedia fails to even mention that debate. [[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]] 09:32, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

:::: Most conservatives ''do'' disapprove of autoeroticism and fellatio. In many conservative-dominated states in America the practice was punishable by prison until recently! You argue that conservatives see sexual practices as a purely private matter and that this is the reason they don't talk about them. But they don't. Conservatives have a long history of trying to meddle with the private sexual life of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowers_v._Hardwick others] (even non-conservatives). Fact is, currently there ''is'' a political debate going on between conservatives about the legality of fellatio, and this encyclopedia fails to even mention that debate. [[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]] 09:32, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

::::: Notice that Fox said "within marriage", not just "in private".  Your example from Wikipedia was not of something "within marriage".  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:37, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

::::: Notice that Fox said "within marriage", not just "in private".  Your example from Wikipedia was not of something "within marriage".  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:37, 17 March 2008 (EDT)