| | :I have every right to criticize Conservapedia. It's a free country. --[[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]] 06:37, 7 June 2008 (EDT) | | :I have every right to criticize Conservapedia. It's a free country. --[[User:Harebrained|Harebrained]] 06:37, 7 June 2008 (EDT) |
| | ::Conservapedia, from my standpoint, was created with the intention of educating and informing people about history, politics, science, religion, etc. from a conservative standpoint. Now, placing articles like those in an encyclopedia hardly works to the benefit of conservative values. It is far more productive to use your resources for writing a quality encyclopedia that everyone of every age can read than to express interest in oversexualized knowledge that will cause debate and concern for individuals across the political/social spectrum. In an Internet culture that is oversaturated with sex and violence, Conservapedia should be considered a safe haven for moral and well-reasoned information.--[[User:CTrooper|CTrooper]] 18:05, 21 July 2008 (EDT) | | ::Conservapedia, from my standpoint, was created with the intention of educating and informing people about history, politics, science, religion, etc. from a conservative standpoint. Now, placing articles like those in an encyclopedia hardly works to the benefit of conservative values. It is far more productive to use your resources for writing a quality encyclopedia that everyone of every age can read than to express interest in oversexualized knowledge that will cause debate and concern for individuals across the political/social spectrum. In an Internet culture that is oversaturated with sex and violence, Conservapedia should be considered a safe haven for moral and well-reasoned information.--[[User:CTrooper|CTrooper]] 18:05, 21 July 2008 (EDT) |