Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,555
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + +
Christine Blasey Ford (view source)
Revision as of 23:34, October 30, 2018
, 23:34, October 30, 2018→Lawyer conduct
The Judiciary Committee issued a statement suggesting that Blasey Ford's legal team may have violated the American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct by apparently withholding key information from their client.<ref>https://www.dailywire.com/news/36684/senate-judiciary-committee-statement-suggests-james-barrett</ref> Blasey Ford's attorneys may face sanctions by the DC Bar Association.<ref>http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/01/theres-good-case-sanctioning-christine-blasey-fords-lawyers/</ref>
The Judiciary Committee issued a statement suggesting that Blasey Ford's legal team may have violated the American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct by apparently withholding key information from their client.<ref>https://www.dailywire.com/news/36684/senate-judiciary-committee-statement-suggests-james-barrett</ref> Blasey Ford's attorneys may face sanctions by the DC Bar Association.<ref>http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/01/theres-good-case-sanctioning-christine-blasey-fords-lawyers/</ref>
On October 30, 2018 Judicial Watch filed a complaint to the Board of Professional Responsibility of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals of [[Debra S. Katz]], Lisa J. Banks, and [[Michael R. Bromwich]] for violating the rules of professional responsibility in their representation of Dr. Blasey Ford before the Senate Judiciary Committee during the [[Kavanaugh nomination hearings.<ref>https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-files-bar-complaint-against-christine-blasey-fords-lawyers/</ref>
===Questionable testimony===
===Questionable testimony===