Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 231:
Line 231: + + + +
→"Son of Man" is a common mistranslation, preferred by liberals, which obscures Jesus's divinity.: You are repeating a statement of which you know that it is not true. That makes you a liar. Simple as that.
:::"of" is merely a pedantic translation, and source confirms that it is not the best translation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 19:09, 21 November 2018 (EST)
:::"of" is merely a pedantic translation, and source confirms that it is not the best translation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 19:09, 21 November 2018 (EST)
::::just to be pedantic: a pedantic translation is not a mistranslation. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:14, 21 November 2018 (EST)
::::just to be pedantic: a pedantic translation is not a mistranslation. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:14, 21 November 2018 (EST)
To summarize: Andy, according to your own sources, "Son of Man" is not a mistranslation. It may not be the best translation (I have stated that again and again and again), but being pedantic, literally, etc. does not make it false.
Andy, you now are aware of the fact that "Son of Man" is not a mistranslation. You are repeating a statement of which you know that it is not true. That makes you a liar. Simple as that. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:26, 21 November 2018 (EST)