Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 236:
Line 236: + +
→"Son of Man" is a common mistranslation, preferred by liberals, which obscures Jesus's divinity.: this article is a testament to your ignorance
Andy, you now are aware of the fact that "Son of Man" is not a mistranslation. You are repeating a statement of which you know that it is not true. That makes you a liar. Simple as that. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:26, 21 November 2018 (EST)
Andy, you now are aware of the fact that "Son of Man" is not a mistranslation. You are repeating a statement of which you know that it is not true. That makes you a liar. Simple as that. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:26, 21 November 2018 (EST)
:August, you protest too much. You admit that "Son of Man" "may not be the best translation." Right. "The Son as man" is a better translation, and conveys divinity that the mistranslation "Son of Man" denies.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:40, 21 November 2018 (EST)
:August, you protest too much. You admit that "Son of Man" "may not be the best translation." Right. "The Son as man" is a better translation, and conveys divinity that the mistranslation "Son of Man" denies.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:40, 21 November 2018 (EST)
::I'm nearly not protesting enough - it is my only remedy (though it won't change a iota on this dismal article). My only consolation is the knowledge that your dubious insights have not gathered any interest around the internet. It's for your own good, as this article is a testament to your ignorance paired with an impressive hubris. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 10:20, 22 November 2018 (EST)