Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
679 bytes added ,  23:23, May 7, 2007
Line 268: Line 268:     
::Unfortunately you also don't seem to care about the number of methodologically sound studies that find no ABC link.  [[User:Murray|Murray]] 17:08, 23 April 2007 (EDT)<br>
 
::Unfortunately you also don't seem to care about the number of methodologically sound studies that find no ABC link.  [[User:Murray|Murray]] 17:08, 23 April 2007 (EDT)<br>
 +
 +
:::You may wish to consider though, why so many do.  Most studies usually have a 95% threshold for saying there is a statistical correlation.  So if there was no statistical correlation between breast cancer and abortion, we would expect that given 20 studies that 18 would show there is no correlation, 1 would show a statical correlation that abortion leads to an increased rate of breast cancer, and 1 would show that abortion lowers the chances of having breast cancer.  For so many studies to show a correlation, even if there are many that do not, chances are very high that some level of correlation exists. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 19:23, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
    
== Historical view of abortion ==
 
== Historical view of abortion ==
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu