157
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 136:
Line 136: + +
Not all claims are credible.
How is this not something that should be in Conservapedia? This is something that people should be talking about.
How is this not something that should be in Conservapedia? This is something that people should be talking about.
:While fetuses are very usful for research purposes, I find the idea of them as a food quite laughable - who would actually eat it? And the source is hardly credible. Abortiontv.com? Hmm.. really respectable and unbiased. And Phelps is a calm and polite debater. Also, before anyone brings it up, the stories about fetuses being used for embryonic stem cell based cosmetic therepy is also a load of nonsense: Such therepy wouldn't work any better than conventional treatments, and the most likely outcome is a rather nasty tumor. - [[User:Suricou|Suricou]]
==Should the article introduce and define the terms "pro-life" and "pro-choice?"==
==Should the article introduce and define the terms "pro-life" and "pro-choice?"==