Changes

==Common traits of fascism and other authoritarian ideologies==

==Common traits of fascism and other authoritarian ideologies==

The common trait of [[leftist]] [[liberalism]], which is promoting the homosexual agenda,<ref>{{cite web |title=An Open Letter to President Vladimir Putin |publisher=Scott Lively Ministries |date=30 Aug 2013 |url=http://www.scottlively.net/2013/08/30/an-open-letter-to-president-vladimir-putin/ |quote= the homosexualist movement ... They ask for a place at the table, but once they have one all the social ideals they exploited to get there, such as social tolerance, freedom of speech, and respect for cultural diversity, are discarded.  In place of those ideals is inserted a new backwards and upside-down morality and world-view that condemns all disapproval of homosexuality as a new fictionalized form of bigotry. I have termed this phenomenon “Homo-fascism” and defined it as a form of extreme left-wing, regressive radicalism which seeks to establish rigid authoritarian controls over all public discourse and government policies regarding sexual norms and proprieties, and to enact punitive measures against conscientious objectors that would punish or suppress all disapproval of homosexuality and related sexual behaviors (that would of course even though they deny it, quickly include a sexual indoctrination and exploitation of children).|accessdate=22 Mar 2017}}</ref> with [[fascism]] and [[Communism]], is not only their endeavor for stronger [[authoritarian]] state, which is supposed to make citizens "happy", but also their [[moral relativism]] and moral [[Mind#Voluntarism|voluntarism]]: What is right is not given [[objective]]ly, but a [[human]] determines it by one’s own [[will]].{{#tag:ref|cf. ''“I decide who is a Jew and who is not”'' (In German: ''"Wer Jude ist, bestimme ich"'') in [[Göring's syndrome]]|group=note}} In fascism it is to be determined by [[Il Duce|Duce]], in [[Nazism]] by [[Führer]], in Communism by [[Politburo]] and in ''leftist liberalism'' by [[person]] himself/herself.{{#tag:ref|cf. ''"The most pitilessly and self-righteously violent regimes of modern history have been those that have most explicitly cast off the [[Christian]] vision of reality and sought to replace it with a more "human" set of values."'' in [[Nimrodian aspirations]]|group=note}} None of these totalitarian ideologies recognizes the [[Natural right|natural]] [[right to life]]{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer#Bonhoeffer on Abortion|Bonhoeffer on Abortion]]|group=note}}; the difference between fascists and leftist liberals consists in question who will gratuitously sent whom to [[death]].<ref>{{cite web

The common trait of [[leftist]] [[liberalism]], which is promoting the homosexual agenda,<ref>{{cite web |title=An Open Letter to President Vladimir Putin |publisher=Scott Lively Ministries |date=30 Aug 2013 |url=http://www.scottlively.net/2013/08/30/an-open-letter-to-president-vladimir-putin/ |quote= the homosexualist movement ... They ask for a place at the table, but once they have one all the social ideals they exploited to get there, such as social tolerance, freedom of speech, and respect for cultural diversity, are discarded.  In place of those ideals is inserted a new backwards and upside-down morality and world-view that condemns all disapproval of homosexuality as a new fictionalized form of bigotry. I have termed this phenomenon “Homo-fascism” and defined it as a form of extreme left-wing, regressive radicalism which seeks to establish rigid authoritarian controls over all public discourse and government policies regarding sexual norms and proprieties, and to enact punitive measures against conscientious objectors that would punish or suppress all disapproval of homosexuality and related sexual behaviors (that would of course even though they deny it, quickly include a sexual indoctrination and exploitation of children).|accessdate=22 Mar 2017}}</ref> with [[fascism]] and [[Communism]], is not only their endeavor for stronger [[authoritarian]] state, which is supposed to make citizens "happy", but also their [[moral relativism]] and moral [[Mind#Voluntarism|voluntarism]]: What is right is not given [[objective]]ly, but a [[human]] determines it by one's own [[will]].{{#tag:ref|cf. ''“I decide who is a Jew and who is not”'' (In German: ''"Wer Jude ist, bestimme ich"'') in [[Göring's syndrome]]|group=note}} In fascism it is to be determined by [[Il Duce|Duce]], in [[Nazism]] by [[Führer]], in Communism by [[Politburo]] and in ''leftist liberalism'' by [[person]] himself/herself.{{#tag:ref|cf. ''"The most pitilessly and self-righteously violent regimes of modern history have been those that have most explicitly cast off the [[Christian]] vision of reality and sought to replace it with a more "human" set of values."'' in [[Nimrodian aspirations]]|group=note}} None of these totalitarian ideologies recognizes the [[Natural right|natural]] [[right to life]]{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer#Bonhoeffer on Abortion|Bonhoeffer on Abortion]]|group=note}}; the difference between fascists and leftist liberals consists in question who will gratuitously sent whom to [[death]].<ref>{{cite web

|title= Ľavicovo-liberálny fašizmus (Leftist Liberal Fascism)

|title= Ľavicovo-liberálny fašizmus (Leftist Liberal Fascism)

|author=Roman Joch

|author=Roman Joch

}}</ref>

}}</ref>

Homo-fascists know that preserving the people’s option to destroy unborn life is essential to maintaining so called "[[sexual freedom]]" as a social "norm". If women lost their choice to legally kill their unborn offspring, the resulting inevitable shift of emphasis from self-gratification to family responsibility in such a large section of the population would change the entire culture. When a woman gives in to fear and [[Egocentric Thinking|selfishness]] to kill the child in her womb, she will not feel that she can criticize other [[sinner]]s. The choice to kill their unborn children morally compromises both men and women (making them unwilling to criticize choices to engage in other forms of [[immoral]] behavior), and ensures that the outcome of an unwanted child will not be a lasting deterrent to those who have chosen sexual "freedom" over family. This explains why homosexuals, who by definition cannot conceive children together, are among the most militant advocates of [[abortion]] on demand.

Homo-fascists know that preserving the people's option to destroy unborn life is essential to maintaining so called "[[sexual freedom]]" as a social "norm". If women lost their choice to legally kill their unborn offspring, the resulting inevitable shift of emphasis from self-gratification to family responsibility in such a large section of the population would change the entire culture. When a woman gives in to fear and [[Egocentric Thinking|selfishness]] to kill the child in her womb, she will not feel that she can criticize other [[sinner]]s. The choice to kill their unborn children morally compromises both men and women (making them unwilling to criticize choices to engage in other forms of [[immoral]] behavior), and ensures that the outcome of an unwanted child will not be a lasting deterrent to those who have chosen sexual "freedom" over family. This explains why homosexuals, who by definition cannot conceive children together, are among the most militant advocates of [[abortion]] on demand.

The homosexual movement has many allies in its campaign to promote sexual immorality, but it is the only social movement in the history of the world whose primary purpose is to eliminate social restraints on [[sexual]] conduct.{{#tag:ref|cf. What distinguishes homosexuality (the indulgence of same-sex attraction) from other sins is that some of those who practice it have created a social and political movement to normalize and legitimize it.<ref name="Lively2009"/>|group=note}} It is heavily funded, highly organized and strategically positioned to maximize its ability to change societies and cultures<ref name="Lively2009">{{cite book |title=Redeeming the Rainbow: A Christian Response to the "Gay" Agenda |author=[[Scott Lively]] |publisher=Veritas Aeterna Press |place=Springfield, MA |year=2009 |edition=1 (Version 1.1)|chapter=1: Pro-family answers to common questions about homosexuality and "gay" agenda |pages= i, 8, 60, 161, 176|url=http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09b/Redeeming_rainbow}}</ref> by means of [[Gleichschaltung#LGBTI Gleichschaltung|LGBTI gleichschaltung]].

The homosexual movement has many allies in its campaign to promote sexual immorality, but it is the only social movement in the history of the world whose primary purpose is to eliminate social restraints on [[sexual]] conduct.{{#tag:ref|cf. What distinguishes homosexuality (the indulgence of same-sex attraction) from other sins is that some of those who practice it have created a social and political movement to normalize and legitimize it.<ref name="Lively2009"/>|group=note}} It is heavily funded, highly organized and strategically positioned to maximize its ability to change societies and cultures<ref name="Lively2009">{{cite book |title=Redeeming the Rainbow: A Christian Response to the "Gay" Agenda |author=[[Scott Lively]] |publisher=Veritas Aeterna Press |place=Springfield, MA |year=2009 |edition=1 (Version 1.1)|chapter=1: Pro-family answers to common questions about homosexuality and "gay" agenda |pages= i, 8, 60, 161, 176|url=http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09b/Redeeming_rainbow}}</ref> by means of [[Gleichschaltung#LGBTI Gleichschaltung|LGBTI gleichschaltung]].