Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
279 bytes added ,  22:40, February 7, 2019
Line 63: Line 63:  
=== Review of the book ''Systematic Atheology: Atheism’s Reasoning with Theology'' by John R. Shook ===
 
=== Review of the book ''Systematic Atheology: Atheism’s Reasoning with Theology'' by John R. Shook ===
   −
An excerpt of the review of the book ''Systematic Atheology: Atheism's Reasoning with Theology'' by John R. Shook by the reviewer philosophy Professor Chris Tweedt indicates:
+
Philosophy Professor Chris Tweedt, who teaches at Christopher Newport University, wrote a review of the book ''Systematic Atheology: Atheism's Reasoning with Theology'' by John R. Shook.<ref>[https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/systematic-atheology-atheisms-reasoning-with-theology/ JOHN R. SHOOK, ''Systematic Atheology: Atheism's Reasoning with Theology'', Reviewed by Chris Tweedt, Christopher Newport University]</ref>
 +
 
 +
An excerpt of the review is given below:
 
{{Cquote|This book, "composed mainly for the edification of [[Atheist apologetics|atheism's defenders]]," (p. 37) is an attempt to understand and defend atheism in an organized way. The book is divided into three sections. The first attempts to define 'atheist', 'atheology', and their relationship by tracking historical uses of the terms. The second is an extensive history of atheistic and atheological western philosophers, and the third, which occupies the last half of the book, is an attempt to systematically undermine every kind of argument for the existence of a god.
 
{{Cquote|This book, "composed mainly for the edification of [[Atheist apologetics|atheism's defenders]]," (p. 37) is an attempt to understand and defend atheism in an organized way. The book is divided into three sections. The first attempts to define 'atheist', 'atheology', and their relationship by tracking historical uses of the terms. The second is an extensive history of atheistic and atheological western philosophers, and the third, which occupies the last half of the book, is an attempt to systematically undermine every kind of argument for the existence of a god.
  
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,865

edits

Navigation menu