1,510 bytes added
, 18:58, May 8, 2007
Despite the [[Bias on Wikipedia]], there are some valuable uses for it:
# Wikipedia is useful to determine what the [[liberal]] viewpoint is. For example, in writing [[Essay:Adultress Story]] it helped to see how the Wikipedia entry defends the story, despite its rejection by the [[New International Version]] of the [[Bible]].
# Wikipedia is useful for referring liberal editors to another place where they can post material that violates [[rules]] on Conservapedia, such as gossip, obscenity and liberal opinion. Instead of simply saying "no", a more diplomatic denial can refer the editor to Wikipedia as a place for such material.
# Wikipedia is useful for watching how a website attempts to boost traffic based on the search algorithms employed by [[Google]]. Overuse of linking, which is distracting to readers, helps boost placement in its search engines. As only a small percentage of Wikipedia users go there first to look for information, Wikipedia (unlike Conservapedia) is overwhelmingly dependent on search engine referrals.
# Wikipedia is useful for watching [[liberal]] vandals communicate with each other there about how they will attempt to harm Conservapedia in order to attempt to censor a conservative message.
# Wikipedia is useful for studying how [[liberals]] deny that they have any bias or even a liberal point of view.
# Wikipedia is useful for seeing how a multi-million dollar for-profit project (Wikia) attempts to profit from a volunteer, not-for-profit project (Wikipedia).