| Line 375: |
Line 375: |
| | *Klukowski, Ken (February 20, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/20/justice-clarence-thomas-takes-constitutional-stand-in-indiana-suv-seizure-case/ Justice Clarence Thomas Takes Constitutional Stand in Indiana SUV Seizure Case]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved February 21, 2019. | | *Klukowski, Ken (February 20, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/20/justice-clarence-thomas-takes-constitutional-stand-in-indiana-suv-seizure-case/ Justice Clarence Thomas Takes Constitutional Stand in Indiana SUV Seizure Case]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved February 21, 2019. |
| | *[https://www.wsj.com/articles/justices-against-unjust-forfeiture-11550708786 Justices Against Unjust Forfeiture]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. February 20, 2019. Retrieved February 21, 2019. | | *[https://www.wsj.com/articles/justices-against-unjust-forfeiture-11550708786 Justices Against Unjust Forfeiture]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. February 20, 2019. Retrieved February 21, 2019. |
| | + | *Davis, Molly (February 23, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/one-supreme-court-victory-hasnt-solved-the-civil-asset-forfeiture-fight One Supreme Court victory hasn't solved the civil asset forfeiture fight]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved February 23, 2019. |
| | *Wolverton, Joe (September 16, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/30084-supreme-court-to-hear-indiana-civil-asset-forfeiture-case Supreme Court to Hear Indiana Civil Asset Forfeiture Case]. ''The New American''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.</ref> It also allowed a Fifth Circuit ruling to stand that protected pro-life Roman Catholic bishops in Texas from having to release private documents because an abortion clinic demanded it.<ref>Multiple references: | | *Wolverton, Joe (September 16, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/30084-supreme-court-to-hear-indiana-civil-asset-forfeiture-case Supreme Court to Hear Indiana Civil Asset Forfeiture Case]. ''The New American''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.</ref> It also allowed a Fifth Circuit ruling to stand that protected pro-life Roman Catholic bishops in Texas from having to release private documents because an abortion clinic demanded it.<ref>Multiple references: |
| | *Barillas, Martin M. (February 19, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/supreme-court-resists-abortionists-attack-on-catholic-bishops-privacy-buryi Supreme Court resists abortionists’ attack on Catholic bishops, privacy, burying aborted babies]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved February 20, 2019. | | *Barillas, Martin M. (February 19, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/supreme-court-resists-abortionists-attack-on-catholic-bishops-privacy-buryi Supreme Court resists abortionists’ attack on Catholic bishops, privacy, burying aborted babies]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved February 20, 2019. |