| Line 376: |
Line 376: |
| | *[https://www.wsj.com/articles/justices-against-unjust-forfeiture-11550708786 Justices Against Unjust Forfeiture]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. February 20, 2019. Retrieved February 21, 2019. | | *[https://www.wsj.com/articles/justices-against-unjust-forfeiture-11550708786 Justices Against Unjust Forfeiture]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. February 20, 2019. Retrieved February 21, 2019. |
| | *Davis, Molly (February 23, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/one-supreme-court-victory-hasnt-solved-the-civil-asset-forfeiture-fight One Supreme Court victory hasn't solved the civil asset forfeiture fight]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved February 23, 2019. | | *Davis, Molly (February 23, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/one-supreme-court-victory-hasnt-solved-the-civil-asset-forfeiture-fight One Supreme Court victory hasn't solved the civil asset forfeiture fight]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved February 23, 2019. |
| − | *Wolverton, Joe (September 16, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/30084-supreme-court-to-hear-indiana-civil-asset-forfeiture-case Supreme Court to Hear Indiana Civil Asset Forfeiture Case]. ''The New American''. Retrieved February 20, 2019.</ref> It also allowed a Fifth Circuit ruling to stand that protected pro-life Roman Catholic bishops in Texas from having to release private documents because an abortion clinic demanded it.<ref>Multiple references: | + | *Wolverton, Joe (September 16, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/30084-supreme-court-to-hear-indiana-civil-asset-forfeiture-case Supreme Court to Hear Indiana Civil Asset Forfeiture Case]. ''The New American''. Retrieved February 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Bala, Nila (March 1, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/432250-why-the-timbs-case-is-about-so-much-more-than-civil-forfeiture Why the Timbs case is about so much more than civil forfeiture]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved March 1, 2019.</ref> It also allowed a Fifth Circuit ruling to stand that protected pro-life Roman Catholic bishops in Texas from having to release private documents because an abortion clinic demanded it.<ref>Multiple references: |
| | *Barillas, Martin M. (February 19, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/supreme-court-resists-abortionists-attack-on-catholic-bishops-privacy-buryi Supreme Court resists abortionists’ attack on Catholic bishops, privacy, burying aborted babies]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved February 20, 2019. | | *Barillas, Martin M. (February 19, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/supreme-court-resists-abortionists-attack-on-catholic-bishops-privacy-buryi Supreme Court resists abortionists’ attack on Catholic bishops, privacy, burying aborted babies]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved February 20, 2019. |
| | *Leonard, Kimberly (February 19, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/supreme-court-declines-abortion-clinic-suit-to-get-lobbying-documents-from-texas-bishops Supreme Court declines abortion clinic suit to get lobbying documents from Texas bishops]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved February 20, 2019. | | *Leonard, Kimberly (February 19, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/supreme-court-declines-abortion-clinic-suit-to-get-lobbying-documents-from-texas-bishops Supreme Court declines abortion clinic suit to get lobbying documents from Texas bishops]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved February 20, 2019. |