Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 309:
Line 309: − + +
→Infastructure proposal
===Infastructure proposal===
===Infastructure proposal===
The Trump Administration released a $1.5 trillion infrastructure proposal that involves cutting regulations and speeding up the permitting process: [http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/12/trump-budget-aims-to-jump-start-construction-cut-red-tape.html][http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/12/trump-wants-1-5t-infrastructure-spending-boost-cuts-to-red-tape.html][https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-budget-infrastructure/trump-unveils-infrastructure-plan-uphill-battle-awaits-in-congress-idUSKBN1FW1X3][https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-budget-infrastructure-energy/trump-infrastructure-plan-would-speed-up-pipelines-cut-environmental-reviews-idUSKBN1FW2Q1][http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/12/donald-trump-launches-1-5-trillion-infrastructure-plan-washington-will-now-be-your-partner/][http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/11/presidents-1-5t-infrastructure-plan-shorten-permitting-invest-rural-train-workforce/][https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/28261-trump-infrastructure-proposal-illustrative-of-modern-american-politics][https://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/economics/item/28264-public-private-partnerships-the-key-to-trumps-infrastructure-plan] Seems like a good plan, though, as ''The New American'' pointed out, some of the government's proposed spending is unconstitutional (at least if the courts would interpret the Constitution as intended). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:00, 12 February 2018 (EST)
The Trump Administration released a $1.5 trillion infrastructure proposal that involves cutting regulations and speeding up the permitting process: [http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/12/trump-budget-aims-to-jump-start-construction-cut-red-tape.html 1],[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/12/trump-wants-1-5t-infrastructure-spending-boost-cuts-to-red-tape.html 2],[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-budget-infrastructure/trump-unveils-infrastructure-plan-uphill-battle-awaits-in-congress-idUSKBN1FW1X3 3],[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-budget-infrastructure-energy/trump-infrastructure-plan-would-speed-up-pipelines-cut-environmental-reviews-idUSKBN1FW2Q1 4],[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/12/donald-trump-launches-1-5-trillion-infrastructure-plan-washington-will-now-be-your-partner/ 5],[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/11/presidents-1-5t-infrastructure-plan-shorten-permitting-invest-rural-train-workforce/ 6],[https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/28261-trump-infrastructure-proposal-illustrative-of-modern-american-politics 7],[https://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/economics/item/28264-public-private-partnerships-the-key-to-trumps-infrastructure-plan 8] Seems like a good plan, though, as ''The New American'' pointed out, some of the government's proposed spending is unconstitutional (at least if the courts would interpret the Constitution as intended). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:00, 12 February 2018 (EST)
:Somewhat interesting article on Trump's infrastructure efforts: [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/04/pinkerton-maiga-make-american-infrastructure-great-again/] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:41, 4 May 2019 (EDT)
== Being friendly to the Democrats ==
== Being friendly to the Democrats ==