Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
376 bytes added ,  23:32, May 9, 2019
Revisionism merge
Line 267: Line 267:     
:::A very good point--yes, please include references. If you used any sources, even just for a basic understanding of the subject, they should always be cited.  If you do not have any, I still suggest you do a little research, and find a good source which supports what you are writing. Common knowledge does not need to be cited (i.e. "red is a color") but when you are making an assertion which some reads may not have already known, try to cite it.  It shouldn't be particularly difficult, just list the source, such as a URL, and perhaps the date you retrieved it.  You are welcome to use any formal citation style, but you are not required or expected to do so.  Most editors just paste the link inside of <code><nowiki><ref> </ref></nowiki></code> tags after the statement being referenced. Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 18:10, 9 May 2019 (EDT)
 
:::A very good point--yes, please include references. If you used any sources, even just for a basic understanding of the subject, they should always be cited.  If you do not have any, I still suggest you do a little research, and find a good source which supports what you are writing. Common knowledge does not need to be cited (i.e. "red is a color") but when you are making an assertion which some reads may not have already known, try to cite it.  It shouldn't be particularly difficult, just list the source, such as a URL, and perhaps the date you retrieved it.  You are welcome to use any formal citation style, but you are not required or expected to do so.  Most editors just paste the link inside of <code><nowiki><ref> </ref></nowiki></code> tags after the statement being referenced. Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 18:10, 9 May 2019 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Historical revisionism and revisionism==
 +
These two pages [[Revisionism]] and [[Historical revisionism]] are basically the same topic and ought to be merged under the banner of the second.  I'll start expanding the revisionism page into general themes afterward. [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 19:32, 9 May 2019 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect, rollback
9,147

edits

Navigation menu