Changes

true" - in this way knowing and accepting both standpoints fallaciously, is not advocated.

true" - in this way knowing and accepting both standpoints fallaciously, is not advocated.

From real point of view, the soul substance is a self-evident entity separate from other substances and inseparable from its own qualities; those who are not able to identify it, if discoursed repeatedly in this way, then they would not be able to understand. Therefore, to make them understand  

From real point of view, the [[soul]] substance is a self-evident entity separate from other substances and inseparable from its own qualities; those who are not able to identify it, if discoursed repeatedly in this way, then they would not be able to understand. Therefore, to make them understand  

is explained by means of conventional standpoint through its embodied forms of human-hellish-earthen beings in association with other substances like

is explained by means of conventional standpoint through its embodied forms of human-hellish-earthen beings in association with other substances like

body, etc.; then "the human being is soul, the hellish being is soul" - they are able to identify the soul along with its embodied forms.

body, etc.; then "the human being is [[soul]], the hellish being is [[soul]]" - they are able to identify the [[soul]] along with its embodied forms.

Or (for the sake of explanation) by creating divisions in the indivisible substance, the details of soul are stated through knowledge, perception, etc. attributes and modifications. Then the knower is the soul, the seer is the soul - with these different traits, they are able to identify the soul.

Or (for the sake of explanation) by creating divisions in the indivisible substance, the details of soul are stated through knowledge, perception, etc. attributes and modifications. Then the knower is the [[soul]], the seer is the [[soul]] - with these different traits, they are able to identify the [[soul]].

Further, from real point of view, passionlessness is the path of liberation. Those who do not understand this, if discoursed repeatedly in this way, then they would not be able to understand. Therefore, by means of conventional standpoint, the details of passionlessness are explained to them in the form of observance of vows, chastity, continence, etc. in relation to dissociation of the instrumentality of other substances; then they are able to identify passionlessness.

Further, from real point of view, passionlessness is the path of liberation. Those who do not understand this, if discoursed repeatedly in this way, then they would not be able to understand. Therefore, by means of conventional standpoint, the details of passionlessness are explained to them in the form of observance of vows, chastity, continence, etc. in relation to dissociation of the instrumentality of other substances; then they are able to identify passionlessness.

Further, from the viewpoint of getting rid of the instrumental cause of other substances, the observance of vows, chastity, continence, etc. is stated to be the liberation path; so one should not believe their observance only to be the liberation path; for, if adopting and forsaking of other substances be possible for the soul then the soul would become the doer and the destroyer of other substances. But no substance is dependent on other substance. Therefore, the soul becomes passionless by renouncing the feelings of attachment, etc. So, in reality, passionlessness only is the liberation path. In some way, there is cause and effect relationship between passionlessness and observance of vows, etc., therefore, observance of vows, etc. is stated to be the liberation path; this statement is for the sake of statement only. In reality, the external conduct is not the liberation path.<ref>http://jainworld.com/pdf/Moksha%20Marg%20Prakashak.pdf</ref>

Further, from the viewpoint of getting rid of the instrumental cause of other substances, the observance of vows, chastity, continence, etc. is stated to be the liberation path; so one should not believe their observance only to be the liberation path; for, if adopting and forsaking of other substances be possible for the [[soul]] then the [[soul]] would become the doer and the destroyer of other substances. But no substance is dependent on other substance. Therefore, the soul becomes passionless by renouncing the feelings of attachment, etc. So, in reality, passionlessness only is the liberation path. In some way, there is cause and effect relationship between passionlessness and observance of vows, etc., therefore, observance of vows, etc. is stated to be the liberation path; this statement is for the sake of statement only. In reality, the external conduct is not the liberation path.<ref>http://jainworld.com/pdf/Moksha%20Marg%20Prakashak.pdf</ref>

==See also==

==See also==