| Line 512: |
Line 512: |
| | *Shackelford, Kelly (June 20, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/kelly-shakelford-supreme-court-peace-cross-decision-religious-freedom Kelly Shackelford: Supreme Court Peace Cross decision is a major victory for religious freedom]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. | | *Shackelford, Kelly (June 20, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/kelly-shakelford-supreme-court-peace-cross-decision-religious-freedom Kelly Shackelford: Supreme Court Peace Cross decision is a major victory for religious freedom]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | *Horowitz, Daniel (June 20, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/bladensburg-cross-pyrrhic-victory-conservatives-supreme-court/ Bladensburg Cross a Pyrrhic victory for conservatives at Supreme Court]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved June 20, 2019.</ref> | | *Horowitz, Daniel (June 20, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/bladensburg-cross-pyrrhic-victory-conservatives-supreme-court/ Bladensburg Cross a Pyrrhic victory for conservatives at Supreme Court]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved June 20, 2019.</ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | In a relatively negative decision, the Supreme Court refused to rein in the [[administrative state]] or strengthen the [[nondelegation doctrine]] by upholding a law that ceded much authority to the Justice Department.<ref>Multiple references: |
| | + | *Thomsen, Jacqueline (June 20, 2019). [https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/449491-supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-sex-offender-registration-law Alito joins with liberals in ruling for sex offender law]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Swoyer, Alex (June 20, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/20/justices-uphold-sex-offender-registry/ Justices uphold sex offender registry]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Quinn, Melissa (June 20, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/supreme-court-finds-sex-offender-registration-law-did-not-violate-constitution Supreme Court finds sex offender registration law did not violate Constitution]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Wolf, Richard (June 20, 2019). [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/20/sex-offender-law-supreme-court-rules-congress-executive-power/3270145002/ Supreme Court upholds power of executive branch to apply sex offender law retroactively]. ''USA Today''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Liptak, Adam (June 20, 2019). [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/20/us/politics/supreme-court-sex-offender-registry.html Supreme Court Sustains Executive Power in Sex Offender Case]. ''The New York Times''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Barnes, Robert (June 20, 2019). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-upholds-sex-offender-rules-but-separation-of-powers-battle-to-continue/2019/06/20/22b3c632-938a-11e9-b58a-a6a9afaa0e3e_story.html Supreme Court upholds sex offender rules, but separation of powers battle to continue]. ''The Washington Post''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Rubin, Jordan S.; Brevetti, Rossella; Robinson, Kimberly Strawbridge (June 20, 2019). [https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/justices-uphold-sex-registration-requirements Supreme Court Rejects Attack on Agency Power—For Now (2)]. ''Bloomberg Law''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Sohoni, Mila (June 20, 2019). [https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/06/opinion-analysis-court-refuses-to-resurrect-nondelegation-doctrine/ Opinion analysis: Court refuses to resurrect nondelegation doctrine]. ''SCOTUSblog''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | See also: |
| | + | *Somin, Ilya (June 20, 2019). [https://reason.com/2019/06/20/a-troubling-supreme-court-decision-on-non-delegation/ A Troubling Supreme Court Decision on Non-Delegation]. ''Reason''. Retrieved June 20, 2019.</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ==Number of judicial appointments== | | ==Number of judicial appointments== |