| Line 454: |
Line 454: |
| | See also: | | See also: |
| | *Duke, Selwyn (May 25, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/32444-taming-the-bench-maga-means-ending-the-precedent-of-judicial-precedent Taming the Bench: MAGA Means Ending the Precedent of Judicial Precedent]. ''The New American''. Retrieved May 26, 2019. | | *Duke, Selwyn (May 25, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/32444-taming-the-bench-maga-means-ending-the-precedent-of-judicial-precedent Taming the Bench: MAGA Means Ending the Precedent of Judicial Precedent]. ''The New American''. Retrieved May 26, 2019. |
| − | *Skurkiss, Peter (May 16, 2019). [https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/05/a_huge_supreme_court_decision_you_never_heard_of.html A huge Supreme Court decision you never heard of]. ''American Thinker''. Retrieved May 26, 2019.</ref> | + | *Skurkiss, Peter (May 16, 2019). [https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/05/a_huge_supreme_court_decision_you_never_heard_of.html A huge Supreme Court decision you never heard of]. ''American Thinker''. Retrieved May 26, 2019.</ref> The Supreme Court again ruled in favor of state sovereignty by refusing to rule against an exception to the [[Double Jeopardy Clause]].<ref>Multiple references: |
| | + | *Bravin, Jess (June 17, 2019). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-upholds-both-federal-and-state-prosecution-for-same-act-11560789570 Supreme Court Upholds Both Federal and State Prosecution for Same Act]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Vadum, Matthew (June 18, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-allows-state-and-federal-prosecutions-for-same-crime_2968669.html Supreme Court Allows State, Federal Prosecutions for Same Crime]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Quinn, Melissa (June 17, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/supreme-court-declines-to-overturn-exception-to-double-jeopardy Supreme Court declines to overturn exception to double jeopardy clause]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Blitzer, Ronn (June 17, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-ruling-deals-potential-blow-to-paul-manafort-as-he-battles-state-charges Supreme Court ruling deals potential blow to Paul Manafort as he battles state charges]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Thomsen, Jacqueline (June 17, 2019). [https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/448874-supreme-court-rules-against-convict-over-double-jeopardy-claims Supreme Court rules defendants can be tried on state and federal charges, potentially impacting Manafort]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Hurley, Lawrence (June 17, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-doublejeopardy/u-s-supreme-court-declines-to-expand-double-jeopardy-protections-idUSKCN1TI1TC U.S. Supreme Court declines to expand 'double jeopardy' protections]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Sherman, Mark (June 17, 2019). [https://www.apnews.com/198d29dad0ed4ba6a3852fca66e52cd5 Supreme Court upholds rule allowing state, federal charges]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Higgins, Tucker (June 17, 2019). [https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/17/scotus-allows-states-and-federal-government-to-prosecute-a-person-for-the-same-crime.html Supreme Court allows states and the federal government to prosecute a person for the same crime, upholding a longstanding rule]. ''CNBC''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *Howe, Amy (June 17, 2019). [https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/06/opinion-analysis-justices-uphold-separate-sovereigns-doctrine/ Opinion analysis: Justices uphold “separate sovereigns” doctrine]. ''SCOTUSblog''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | See also: |
| | + | *Watins, William J. (June 20, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/449594-a-states-sovereignty-trumps-double-jeopardy A state's sovereignty trumps double jeopardy]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 20, 2019. |
| | + | *McCarthy, Andrew C. (June 19, 2019). [https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/06/supreme-court-upholds-dual-sovereignty-doctrine/ The Supreme Court Was Right to Uphold the Dual-Sovereignty Doctrine]. ''National Review''. Retrieved June 20, 2019.</ref> |
| | | | |
| | On immigration, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Trump Administration's conservative policies, ruling that the federal government could detain immigrants with criminal records for deportation anytime after their release from prison, rather than just at the very moment of their release.<ref>Multiple references: | | On immigration, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Trump Administration's conservative policies, ruling that the federal government could detain immigrants with criminal records for deportation anytime after their release from prison, rather than just at the very moment of their release.<ref>Multiple references: |