Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 476:
Line 476: − + + + Line 484:
Line 486: − + +
Donald Trump achievements: The courts (view source)
Revision as of 03:28, June 27, 2019
, 03:28, June 27, 2019→2019
*Gresko, Jessica (June 21, 2019). [https://www.apnews.com/e4726b6d6d5d4de286a43d2301ac63b9 Justices: Landowner can take property case to federal court]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Gresko, Jessica (June 21, 2019). [https://www.apnews.com/e4726b6d6d5d4de286a43d2301ac63b9 Justices: Landowner can take property case to federal court]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Unruh, Bob (June 21, 2019). [https://www.wnd.com/2019/06/supremes-open-federal-courts-to-property-takings-fights/ Supremes open federal courts to property takings fights]. ''WND''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Unruh, Bob (June 21, 2019). [https://www.wnd.com/2019/06/supremes-open-federal-courts-to-property-takings-fights/ Supremes open federal courts to property takings fights]. ''WND''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
*Liptak, Adam (June 21, 2019). [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/21/us/politics/supreme-court-precedent.html In Property Rights Case, Justices Sharply Debate Power of Precedent]. ''The New York Times''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.</ref> The Supreme Court protected free speech rights by striking down a statutory provision banning trademarks deemed immoral or scandalous.<ref>Multiple references:
*Liptak, Adam (June 21, 2019). [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/21/us/politics/supreme-court-precedent.html In Property Rights Case, Justices Sharply Debate Power of Precedent]. ''The New York Times''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
See also:
*Larkin, Paul J. (June 25, 2019). [https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/paul-j-larkin-jr/scotus-deserves-praise-reversing-itself-takings-clause-injustice SCOTUS Deserves Praise for Reversing Itself on Takings Clause Injustice]. ''CNS News''. Retrieved June 26, 2019.</ref> The Supreme Court protected free speech rights by striking down a statutory provision banning trademarks deemed immoral or scandalous.<ref>Multiple references:
*Bravin, Jess (June 24, 2019). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-strikes-down-ban-on-immoral-or-scandalous-trademarks-11561387715 Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on Immoral or Scandalous Trademarks]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Bravin, Jess (June 24, 2019). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-strikes-down-ban-on-immoral-or-scandalous-trademarks-11561387715 Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on Immoral or Scandalous Trademarks]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Blitzer, Ronn (June 24, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-strikes-down-ban-on-scandalous-trademarks-in-dispute-over-fuct-clothing-line Supreme Court strikes down ban on scandalous trademarks, in dispute over ‘FUCT’ clothing line]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Blitzer, Ronn (June 24, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-strikes-down-ban-on-scandalous-trademarks-in-dispute-over-fuct-clothing-line Supreme Court strikes down ban on scandalous trademarks, in dispute over ‘FUCT’ clothing line]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Thomsen, Jacqueline (June 24, 2019). [https://thehill.com/regulation/449999-supreme-court-strikes-down-provision-on-immoral-trademarks Supreme Court strikes down provision on 'immoral' trademarks]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Thomsen, Jacqueline (June 24, 2019). [https://thehill.com/regulation/449999-supreme-court-strikes-down-provision-on-immoral-trademarks Supreme Court strikes down provision on 'immoral' trademarks]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Gresko, Jessica (June 24, 2019). [https://www.apnews.com/f0767a6ce1aa4dde88fe53b5f1392477 High court strikes down ‘scandalous’ part of trademark law]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Gresko, Jessica (June 24, 2019). [https://www.apnews.com/f0767a6ce1aa4dde88fe53b5f1392477 High court strikes down ‘scandalous’ part of trademark law]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Chung, Andrew (June 24, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-profanity/supreme-court-allows-foul-language-trademarks-in-f-word-case-idUSKCN1TP1TQ Supreme Court allows foul language trademarks in F-word case]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.</ref>
*Chung, Andrew (June 24, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-profanity/supreme-court-allows-foul-language-trademarks-in-f-word-case-idUSKCN1TP1TQ Supreme Court allows foul language trademarks in F-word case]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Haynes, Danielle (June 24, 2019). [https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2019/06/24/Supreme-Court-strikes-down-law-against-scandalous-trademarks/3291561399016/ Supreme Court strikes down law against 'scandalous' trademarks]. ''UPI''. Retrieved June 26, 2019.</ref>
On immigration, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Trump Administration's conservative policies, ruling that the federal government could detain immigrants with criminal records for deportation anytime after their release from prison, rather than just at the very moment of their release.<ref>Multiple references:
On immigration, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Trump Administration's conservative policies, ruling that the federal government could detain immigrants with criminal records for deportation anytime after their release from prison, rather than just at the very moment of their release.<ref>Multiple references: