| Line 571: |
Line 571: |
| | *Lee, Evan (June 21, 2019). [https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/06/opinion-analysis-felons-in-possession-must-know-they-are-felons/ Opinion analysis: Felons-in-possession must know they are felons]. ''SCOTUSblog''. Retrieved June 21, 2019. | | *Lee, Evan (June 21, 2019). [https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/06/opinion-analysis-felons-in-possession-must-know-they-are-felons/ Opinion analysis: Felons-in-possession must know they are felons]. ''SCOTUSblog''. Retrieved June 21, 2019. |
| | See also: | | See also: |
| − | *Daley, Kevin (January 13, 2019). [https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/13/supreme-court-gun-illegal-alien/ Supreme Court To Review Illegal Immigrant’s Gun Possession Conviction]. ''The Daily Caller''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.</ref> | + | *Daley, Kevin (January 13, 2019). [https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/13/supreme-court-gun-illegal-alien/ Supreme Court To Review Illegal Immigrant’s Gun Possession Conviction]. ''The Daily Caller''. Retrieved June 21, 2019.</ref> Additionally, while limiting the [[Auer deference]], the Court refused to overturn the pro-[[administrative state]] precedent.<ref>Multiple references: |
| | + | *Gresko, Jessica (June 26, 2019). [https://www.apnews.com/8ae84f73e1fd412fad537c485086d94c High court upholds precedents on deference to agencies]. ''Associated Press''. Retrieved June 26, 2019. |
| | + | *Chung, Andrew (June 26, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-regulation/supreme-court-chips-away-at-federal-agency-power-idUSKCN1TR25L Supreme Court chips away at federal agency power]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved June 26, 2019. |
| | + | *Vadum, Matthew (June 26, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-leaves-underpinning-of-administrative-state-in-place_2979986.html Supreme Court Leaves Underpinning of Administrative State in Place]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved June 26, 2019. |
| | + | *Quinn, Melissa (June 26, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/supreme-court-leaves-alone-doctrine-of-deference-to-administrative-decisions Supreme Court leaves in place doctrine of deference to administrative decisions]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved June 26, 2019. |
| | + | *Howe, Amy (June 26, 2019). [https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/06/opinion-analysis-justices-leave-agency-deference-doctrine-in-place/ Opinion analysis: Justices leave agency deference doctrine in place – with limits (Updated)]. ''SCOTUSblog''. Retrieved June 26, 2019. |
| | + | *Wolf, Richard (June 26, 2019). [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/26/supreme-court-rules-conservative-effort-weaken-federal-agencies/1421582001/ Supreme Court won't strip federal agencies of all power to interpret regulations, a top priority of conservatives]. ''USA Today''. Retrieved June 26, 2019. |
| | + | *Liptak, Adam (June 26, 2019). [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/26/us/politics/supreme-court-agency-power.html Supreme Court Limits Agency Power, a Goal of the Right]. ''The New York Times''. Retrieved June 26, 2019. |
| | + | *Hughes, Clyde (June 26, 2019). [https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2019/06/26/Supreme-Court-affirms-97-ruling-on-agency-powers/5661561570059/ Supreme Court affirms '97 ruling on agency powers]. ''UPI''. Retrieved June 26, 2019. |
| | + | *Higgins, Tucker (June 26, 2019). [https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/26/supreme-court-refuses-to-overturn-auer-rule-that-bolsters-regulators.html Supreme Court decision keeps ‘Auer deference,’ which strengthens power of government regulators]. ''CNBC''. Retrieved June 26, 2019. |
| | + | *Stohr, Greg (June 26, 2019). [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-26/top-court-rebuffs-businesses-won-t-topple-regulation-precedent Supreme Court Rebuffs Businesses, Won't Topple Regulation Precedent]. ''Bloomberg''. Retrieved June 26, 2019. |
| | + | *Barnes, Robert; Marimow, Ann E. (June 26, 2019). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-federal-agency-expertise-on-ambiguous-regulations/2019/06/26/0e29a680-9814-11e9-916d-9c61607d8190_story.html Supreme Court rules in favor of federal agency expertise on ambiguous regulations]. ''The Washington Post''. Retrieved June 26, 2019. |
| | + | See also: |
| | + | *Daley, Kevin (June 26, 2019). [https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/26/supreme-court-auer-decision/ Liberals Win The Day At Supreme Court, Though Gerrymandering And Census Cases Remain]. ''The Daily Caller''. Retrieved June 26, 2019. |
| | + | *Hillyer, Quin (June 26, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/in-battle-vs-bureaucracies-john-roberts-wimps-out-again In battle vs. bureaucracies, John Roberts wimps out again]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved June 26, 2019. |
| | + | *French, David (June 26, 2019). [https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/06/john-roberts-throws-the-administrative-state-a-lifeline/ John Roberts Throws the Administrative State a Lifeline]. ''National Review''. Retrieved June 26, 2019.</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ==Number of judicial appointments== | | ==Number of judicial appointments== |