Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 708:
Line 708: − + + + +
Donald Trump achievements: The courts (view source)
Revision as of 00:05, July 18, 2019
, 00:05, July 18, 2019→2019
*Cheong, Ian Miles (July 6, 2019). [https://humanevents.com/2019/07/06/trumps-citizenship-question-isnt-controversial-obama-deleting-it-shouldve-been/ Trump’s Citizenship Question Isn’t Controversial. Obama Deleting It Should’ve Been.] ''Human Events''. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
*Cheong, Ian Miles (July 6, 2019). [https://humanevents.com/2019/07/06/trumps-citizenship-question-isnt-controversial-obama-deleting-it-shouldve-been/ Trump’s Citizenship Question Isn’t Controversial. Obama Deleting It Should’ve Been.] ''Human Events''. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
*Trowbridge, Ronald L. (July 11, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/452559-census-citizenship-question-is-constitutional-and-should-be-approved Census citizenship question is constitutional and should be approved]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
*Trowbridge, Ronald L. (July 11, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/452559-census-citizenship-question-is-constitutional-and-should-be-approved Census citizenship question is constitutional and should be approved]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
*Hals, Tom (July 8, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-census-legal/in-losing-legal-battles-over-census-trump-may-win-political-war-idUSKCN1U3121 In losing legal battles over census, Trump may win political war]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved July 12, 2019.</ref>
*Hals, Tom (July 8, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-census-legal/in-losing-legal-battles-over-census-trump-may-win-political-war-idUSKCN1U3121 In losing legal battles over census, Trump may win political war]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved July 12, 2019.</ref> Some conservatives criticized the Court's decision in ''Mitchell v. Wisconsin'' for undermining the Fourth and Tenth Amendments.<ref>Wolverton, Joe (July 17, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/32869-supreme-court-case-repeals-fourth-and-10th-amendments-republican-government Supreme Court Case Repeals Fourth and 10th Amendments, Republican Government]. ''The New American''. Retrieved July 17, 2019.<br>See also:
*Swoyer, Alex (July 17, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/27/supreme-court-upholds-blood-tests-sans-warrant-unc/ Supreme Court upholds blood tests without warrant for unconscious drivers]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved July 17, 2019.
*Hurley, Lawrence; Chung, Andrew (July 27, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-blood/supreme-court-oks-blood-draws-from-unconscious-drivers-without-warrants-idUSKCN1TS3A9 Supreme Court OKs blood draws from unconscious drivers without warrants]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved July 17, 2019.
*Wolf, Richard; Phillips, Kristine (June 27, 2019). [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/27/drunk-driving-supreme-court-rules-blood-draw-sleeping-driver/1422916001/ Supreme Court rules police don't need warrant to use blood drawn from unconscious drunk driver]. ''USA Today''. Retrieved July 17, 2019.</ref>
==Number of judicial appointments==
==Number of judicial appointments==