Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 531:
Line 531: − + + +
Donald Trump achievements: The courts (view source)
Revision as of 01:48, July 18, 2019
, 01:48, July 18, 2019→2019: Ref.
*Larkin, Paul J. (June 25, 2019). [https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/paul-j-larkin-jr/scotus-deserves-praise-reversing-itself-takings-clause-injustice SCOTUS Deserves Praise for Reversing Itself on Takings Clause Injustice]. ''CNS News''. Retrieved June 26, 2019.
*Larkin, Paul J. (June 25, 2019). [https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/paul-j-larkin-jr/scotus-deserves-praise-reversing-itself-takings-clause-injustice SCOTUS Deserves Praise for Reversing Itself on Takings Clause Injustice]. ''CNS News''. Retrieved June 26, 2019.
*Carrington, Adam (June 27, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/in-knick-v-township-of-scott-a-restoration-for-civil-liberty In Knick v. Township of Scott, a restoration for civil liberty]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Carrington, Adam (June 27, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/in-knick-v-township-of-scott-a-restoration-for-civil-liberty In Knick v. Township of Scott, a restoration for civil liberty]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
*Martin, Christina (June 27, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/450556-landmark-supreme-court-decision-revives-property-rights Landmark Supreme Court decision revives property rights]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.</ref> The Supreme Court protected free speech rights by striking down a statutory provision banning trademarks deemed immoral or scandalous.<ref>Multiple references:
*Martin, Christina (June 27, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/450556-landmark-supreme-court-decision-revives-property-rights Landmark Supreme Court decision revives property rights]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
A similar case decided in 2019:
*Vadum, Matthew (July 17, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/appeals-court-vindicates-veteran-jailed-for-digging-ponds-on-his-property_3006596.html Appeals Court Vindicates Veteran Jailed for Digging Ponds on His Property]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved July 17, 2019.</ref> The Supreme Court protected free speech rights by striking down a statutory provision banning trademarks deemed immoral or scandalous.<ref>Multiple references:
*Bravin, Jess (June 24, 2019). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-strikes-down-ban-on-immoral-or-scandalous-trademarks-11561387715 Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on Immoral or Scandalous Trademarks]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Bravin, Jess (June 24, 2019). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-strikes-down-ban-on-immoral-or-scandalous-trademarks-11561387715 Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on Immoral or Scandalous Trademarks]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Blitzer, Ronn (June 24, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-strikes-down-ban-on-scandalous-trademarks-in-dispute-over-fuct-clothing-line Supreme Court strikes down ban on scandalous trademarks, in dispute over ‘FUCT’ clothing line]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
*Blitzer, Ronn (June 24, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-strikes-down-ban-on-scandalous-trademarks-in-dispute-over-fuct-clothing-line Supreme Court strikes down ban on scandalous trademarks, in dispute over ‘FUCT’ clothing line]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 24, 2019.