Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
166 bytes added ,  14:56, August 7, 2019
clarification; another example
Line 1: Line 1: −
The fallacy of the '''stolen [[concept]]''', also known as the fallacy of the '''self-negating statement''', is the [[logical fallacy]] of implicitly affirming what one wants to disprove or, alternatively, implicitly denying what one wants to prove.  That is, the [[conclusion]] [[contradiction|contradicts]] one of the [[premise]]s.  More formally, the fallacy starts with a premise ''P'' and somehow reaches the conclusion not-''P''.  The term "stolen concept" refers to a concept that is "stolen" from the [[quoting out of context|context]] that gives that concept meaning.
+
The fallacy of the '''stolen [[concept]]''', also known as the fallacy of the '''self-negating statement''', is the [[logical fallacy]] of implicitly affirming what one wants to disprove or, alternatively, implicitly denying what one wants to prove.  That is, the [[conclusion]] [[contradiction|contradicts]] one of the [[premise]]s, often because one of the premises contains an internal contradiction.  More formally, the fallacy starts with a premise ''P'' and somehow reaches the conclusion not-''P''.  The term "stolen concept" refers to a concept that is "stolen" from the [[quoting out of context|context]] that gives that concept meaning.
 
==Examples==
 
==Examples==
 
*[[Communist]]s claim that property is theft, but the concept of theft presupposes a right to own property.
 
*[[Communist]]s claim that property is theft, but the concept of theft presupposes a right to own property.
Line 10: Line 10:  
*[[Evolutionists]] use the [[argument from poor design]] to attempt to disprove [[creationism]]; however, according to evolutionism, natural selection should have selected out all suboptimal designs.
 
*[[Evolutionists]] use the [[argument from poor design]] to attempt to disprove [[creationism]]; however, according to evolutionism, natural selection should have selected out all suboptimal designs.
 
*Liberals keep bringing up a subject just to say that that they are not interested in it, which they would not do if they were genuinely not interested in it.
 
*Liberals keep bringing up a subject just to say that that they are not interested in it, which they would not do if they were genuinely not interested in it.
 +
*The common writing advice "Never use [[adverb]]s" is problematic because "never" is an adverb.
    
==See also==
 
==See also==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026

edits

Navigation menu