| | *[[Communist]]s claim that property is theft, but the concept of theft presupposes a right to own property. | | *[[Communist]]s claim that property is theft, but the concept of theft presupposes a right to own property. |
| − | *[[Liberal Christianity|Liberal Christians]] claim that the [[Bible]], when [[Cafeteria Christianity|"rightly" divided]] and [[allegorical interpretation|"correctly" interpreted]], is the ultimate authority on [[faith]]. However, for that to work, the truly ultimate authority on faith would be the standard used for choosing which Bible verses to follow and for interpreting them, not the Bible itself. | + | *[[Liberal Christianity|Liberal Christians]] claim that the [[Bible]], when [[Cafeteria Christianity|"rightly" divided]] and [[allegorical interpretation|"correctly" interpreted]], is the ultimate authority on [[faith]]. (Similarly, some cults use that definition to accept the Bible as "an authority" - always subservient, however, to any "further revelation" that the group considers authoritative.) However, for that to work, their "ultimate authority" is the standard they use for choosing which Bible verses to follow and for interpreting them, not the Bible itself. |
| | * Liberal Christians may also identify as members of a church defined by adherence to a [[magisterium]], even as they reject that magisterium. This is particularly true of [[cafeteria Catholic]]s. | | * Liberal Christians may also identify as members of a church defined by adherence to a [[magisterium]], even as they reject that magisterium. This is particularly true of [[cafeteria Catholic]]s. |
| | *[[Pro-abortion]] activists argue that since there are no such things as [[unalienable rights]], there is no [[right to life]], so that there is an unalienable right to [[abortion]]. | | *[[Pro-abortion]] activists argue that since there are no such things as [[unalienable rights]], there is no [[right to life]], so that there is an unalienable right to [[abortion]]. |