Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,634
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 37:
Line 37: − + + +
→Tyranny by judges
===Tyranny by judges===
===Tyranny by judges===
{{See also|Judicial activism}}
{{See also|Judicial activism}}
Liberals have traditionally avoided legislation and the consent of the governed to bring about social change, and have focused on ''judicial fiat'' law to impose a [[cultural Marxist]] agenda, abortion and [[same-sex "marriage"]] being only two of dozens of obvious examples. Liberal judges, under a belief in a "[[Living Constitution]]", feel that they can by-pass elected legislators and "legislate from the bench" or write law themselves.
Liberals have traditionally avoided legislation and the consent of the governed to bring about social change, and have focused on ''judicial fiat'' law to impose a [[cultural Marxist]] agenda, [[abortion]] and [[same-sex "marriage"]] being only two of dozens of obvious examples. Liberal judges, under a belief in a "[[Living Constitution]]", feel that they can by-pass elected legislators and "legislate from the bench" or write law themselves.
In 2014 for example, a federal judge in California overturned a citizen's referendum which passed overwhelming to amend the state constitution to ban same sex marriage; California [[Attorney General]] [[Kamala Harris]] refused to defend the lower court ruling in Appeals Court, "legalizing gay marriage in California ''against '' the will of the voters and without action by the legislature.
===Attack on national sovereignty===
===Attack on national sovereignty===