Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
906 bytes added ,  22:45, September 19, 2019
no edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:  
Charles Louis Richter declared in his interview with the International Society for Historians of Atheism, Secularism, and Humanism (ISHASH) about [[atheism and anarchism]] and [[American atheism|America and atheism]]:
 
Charles Louis Richter declared in his interview with the International Society for Historians of Atheism, Secularism, and Humanism (ISHASH) about [[atheism and anarchism]] and [[American atheism|America and atheism]]:
 
{{Cquote|The turn of the century ended the [[Golden Age of Freethought|golden age of nineteenth century freethought]] with two events: the death of [[Robert G. Ingersoll|Robert Ingersoll]] in 1899, and the assassination of President [[William McKinley]] in 1901. The lack of a widely popular voice for irreligion, combined with the murder of the president by an anarchist, led to a backlash against not only anarchism but also atheism. From that point, Americans tended to see irreligion in terms of whatever ostensibly foreign ideology seemed most threatening. So for the rest of the century, we see atheism and atheists associated with anarchism, [[fascism]], [[socialism]], and of course [[Soviet Union|Soviet]]-style communism. By the late seventies, [[secular humanism]] became the buzzword for a whole suite of threats not only to religion, but to Americanism. It’s important to note that this phenomenon is not limited to the political or [[religious right]]; [[liberal]]s also framed irreligion as un-American.<ref>[https://atheismsecularismhumanism.wordpress.com/ ISHASH MEMBER INTERVIEW: CHARLES LOUIS RICHTER], International Society for Historians of Atheism, Secularism, and Humanism</ref>}}
 
{{Cquote|The turn of the century ended the [[Golden Age of Freethought|golden age of nineteenth century freethought]] with two events: the death of [[Robert G. Ingersoll|Robert Ingersoll]] in 1899, and the assassination of President [[William McKinley]] in 1901. The lack of a widely popular voice for irreligion, combined with the murder of the president by an anarchist, led to a backlash against not only anarchism but also atheism. From that point, Americans tended to see irreligion in terms of whatever ostensibly foreign ideology seemed most threatening. So for the rest of the century, we see atheism and atheists associated with anarchism, [[fascism]], [[socialism]], and of course [[Soviet Union|Soviet]]-style communism. By the late seventies, [[secular humanism]] became the buzzword for a whole suite of threats not only to religion, but to Americanism. It’s important to note that this phenomenon is not limited to the political or [[religious right]]; [[liberal]]s also framed irreligion as un-American.<ref>[https://atheismsecularismhumanism.wordpress.com/ ISHASH MEMBER INTERVIEW: CHARLES LOUIS RICHTER], International Society for Historians of Atheism, Secularism, and Humanism</ref>}}
−
 
+
[[File:Jerry Coyne at The Amazing Meeting - 2013.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|The atheist [[Jerry Coyne]] speaking at a 2013 atheist meeting entitled The Amazing Meeting (TAM). TAM is an annual meeting.
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
In 2011, Coyne said about the atheist conferences which he attended that they had an [[Atheism and arrogance|air of self-congratulation]].<ref name="whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com">[https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2011/06/10/are-there-too-many-atheist-meetings/ Are there too many atheist meetings?] by Jerry Coyne</ref>  He also indicated about atheist meetings: "But to me the speakers and talks have often seemed repetitive: the same crew of jet-set skeptics giving the same talks."<ref name="whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com">[https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2011/06/10/are-there-too-many-atheist-meetings/ Are there too many atheist meetings?] by Jerry Coyne</ref>]]
 
The atheist [[Jerry Coyne]] said about the [[atheist conferences]] which he attended:
 
The atheist [[Jerry Coyne]] said about the [[atheist conferences]] which he attended:
 
{{cquote|But to me the speakers and talks have often seemed repetitive: the same crew of jet-set skeptics giving the same talks.
 
{{cquote|But to me the speakers and talks have often seemed repetitive: the same crew of jet-set skeptics giving the same talks.
SkipCaptcha
6,434

edits

Navigation menu