Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,435
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: +
→Hostage photo: Show some cites.
:::::Actually Pipes does not personally make the assertion, he cites 5 eyewitnesses. And I am not certain we should even countentance giving any credibility whatsoever to using terrorists to refute them. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:55, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::Actually Pipes does not personally make the assertion, he cites 5 eyewitnesses. And I am not certain we should even countentance giving any credibility whatsoever to using terrorists to refute them. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:55, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
::::::He may cite 5 eyewitnesses, but he discounts reports from at least 5 other eyewitnesses who disagree with his POV. He's assuming his conclusion. Even the jihadwatch article I've cited (which is hardly objective) says that the evidence is inconclusive. If Conservapedia's goal is accuracy and not truthiness, then we should be honest and say that the evidence is inconclusive.[[User:JohnSmith|JohnSmith]] 18:03, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
::::::He may cite 5 eyewitnesses, but he discounts reports from at least 5 other eyewitnesses who disagree with his POV. He's assuming his conclusion. Even the jihadwatch article I've cited (which is hardly objective) says that the evidence is inconclusive. If Conservapedia's goal is accuracy and not truthiness, then we should be honest and say that the evidence is inconclusive.[[User:JohnSmith|JohnSmith]] 18:03, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::::Show some cites. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:04, 12 May 2007 (EDT)