1,267
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 313:
Line 313: +
Debate: 15 questions for evolutionists (view source)
Revision as of 20:59, October 12, 2019
, 20:59, October 12, 2019→Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes?
===What a creationist would reply===
===What a creationist would reply===
I don't know, evolutionism seems kind of like a cult to me. It is very dogmatic, in that whenever you propose the idea that evolution is a blatantly false conspiracy theory, they huff, "Well, that's ridiculous." Creationism is ridiculous is their only counter-argument. It may be widely accepted by "scientists," but what about devout religious people? Many practicing Jews, Christians, Muslims, etc. disbelieve evolution. Evolutionists regularly imply that proponents of intelligent design are stupid, idiotic, yet they still can't explain beauty or human sapience. It is relatively simple: evolutionism is a cult-like ideology, postulating that we are the same as animals, when no chimp has ever built a skyscraper or went to the moon. And if you dare to disagree with the slightest aspect of the conspiracy Theory of Evolution, you are excised. You are ostracized. You are dismissed as idiotic. So no, evolution is not some ultimate truth, no postulating that it's cultist is not "ridiculous," and no, it still can't explain the evidence.
[[Category:Debate]]
[[Category:Debate]]