1,267
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 267:
Line 267: + + + + +
Debate: 15 questions for evolutionists (view source)
Revision as of 03:10, October 13, 2019
, 03:10, October 13, 2019→How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years, if evolution has changed worms into humans in the same time frame?
===What a creationist would reply===
===What a creationist would reply===
No, we did not come from ooze! My goodness, is this the point we've gotten to?
"This is more impressive as well." Evolutionists constantly rip Creationists for using that argument, so don't. It's a cop-out. And no, it would not be impressive, it would be disgusting. God brought us into this world, shaping Adam in His image from dirt and mud. Sure, that sounds unflattering, (except that we were made by God), but it's much better than "bacteria in ooze." Spare me.
"It is necessary that the environment exert some kind of natural selection pressure on the organism for evolution to occur." What do you mean, specifically? You mean all those organisms around volcanoes, swamps, deposits, which still won't evolve? The environment is exerting pressure on organisms every day! With all the hurricanes and wildfires going on due to the Earth's natural processes, there would be dozens of new phyla by now if what you were saying was accurate! ---BernieandTrumpFan
==How did blind chemistry create mind/ intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality?==
==How did blind chemistry create mind/ intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality?==