1,267
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 281:
Line 281: + + + + +
Debate: 15 questions for evolutionists (view source)
Revision as of 03:33, October 13, 2019
, 03:33, October 13, 2019→What a creationist would reply
===What a creationist would reply===
===What a creationist would reply===
I will re-state what I said below. Evolution still can't explain human sapience!
We are self-aware of being self-aware of our self-awareness! There used to be courses in university studying existential crises. As I also said below, no chimp has ever built a skyscraper or gone to the moon. In addition to that, I will advise you to note that according to mainstream evolutionists, the human and the chimpanzee have only a 2% DNA difference. As for the suggestion that evolution is not philosophical, then it is not worth my time. I believe in Creationism/intelligent design not only because it makes sense, but because it is philosophical. I am a God-fearing man.
Also, evolution and evolutionism are quite atheistic (meaning godless) and anarchistic, and the idea that we are the same as animals, and therefore we should act as they do, has been used as justification by a wide variety of genocidal dictators, who are overwhelmingly evolutionists. It just felt pertinent to point that out. ---BernieandTrumpFan
==Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated?==
==Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated?==