Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 275:
Line 275: + +
→External links: added link to http://www.bible.ca/history/philip-schaff/7_ch07.htm
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infant_baptism '''Infant baptism''' - Wikipedia]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infant_baptism '''Infant baptism''' - Wikipedia]
[http://www.bible.ca/history/philip-schaff/7_ch07.htm '''History of the Christian Church. Chapter VII. The Sacramentarian Controversies''' (bible.ca)] —"''All the Reformers retained the custom of infant-baptism, and opposed rebaptism (''Weiderfaufe'') as a heresy. So far they agreed with the Catholics against the Anabaptists, or Catabaptists as they are called, although they rejected the name, because in their view the baptism of infants was no baptism at all.''" §''102 The Anabaptist Controversy. Luther and Huebmaier''.
[https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/kevin-deyoung/a-brief-defense-of-infant-baptism/ '''A Brief Defense of Infant Baptism''', Kevin DeYoung (thegospelcoalition.org)] —"''...within two centuries of the Apostles we have clear evidence that the church was practicing infant baptism. If this had been a change to long-standing tradition, we would have some record of the church arguing over this new practice. It wasn’t until the sixteenth century that Christians began to question the legitimacy of infant baptism.''"
[https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/kevin-deyoung/a-brief-defense-of-infant-baptism/ '''A Brief Defense of Infant Baptism''', Kevin DeYoung (thegospelcoalition.org)] —"''...within two centuries of the Apostles we have clear evidence that the church was practicing infant baptism. If this had been a change to long-standing tradition, we would have some record of the church arguing over this new practice. It wasn’t until the sixteenth century that Christians began to question the legitimacy of infant baptism.''"